3
submitted 4 hours ago by cypherpunks@lemmy.ml to c/eleven@lemmy.ml
[-] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 hours ago

huh? mobile hotspot is double-bad

148
i'm a hardliner (thelemmy.club)
submitted 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) by cypherpunks@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml
[-] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Metro_Surge is (according to DHS) "the largest immigration enforcement operation ever carried out"

26
[-] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 2 points 7 hours ago

I don’t think anyone called those “web apps” though. I sure didn’t.

As I recall, the phrase didn’t enter common usage until the advent of AJAX, which allowed for dynamically loading data without loading or re-loading a whole page. Early webmail sites simply loaded a new page every time you clicked a link. They didn’t even need JavaScript.

The term "web app" hadn't been coined yet but, even without AJAX I think in retrospect it's reasonable to call things like the early versions of Hotmail and RocketMail applications - they were functional replacements for a native application, on the web, even though they did require a new page load for every click (or at least every click that required network interaction).

At some point, though, I'm pretty sure that some clicks didn't require server connections, and those didn't require another page load (at least if js was enabled): this is what "DHTML" originally meant: using JavaScript to modify the DOM client-side, in the era before sans-page-reload network connections were technically possible.

The term DHTML definitely predates AJAX and the existence of XMLHTTP (later XMLHttpRequest), so it's also odd that this article writes a lot about the former while not mentioning the latter. (The article actually incorrectly defines DHTML as making possible "websites that could refresh interactive data without the need for a page reload" - that was AJAX, not DHTML.)

[-] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 7 points 23 hours ago

Weird this article doesn't mention Hotmail and RocketMail, which both had email client web apps in 1996.

21
58
[-] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 day ago

And of course it is the children’s fault. [...] I do hate that older generations do this. It is our generations responsibility that most parents failed at.

Did you read the article? Here is an excerpt:

It’s worth pausing here to point out that you can’t really blame younger people for struggling at what were once seen as academic basics. The school system is in shambles, their education was bisected by the COVID pandemic, and they’re been reared in a world that’s increasingly deemphasized reading in favor of videos, voiceovers, and other emerging forms of communication.

18
submitted 1 day ago by cypherpunks@lemmy.ml to c/badnews@lemmy.ml
614
"lessons learned" (thelemmy.club)
[-] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 9 points 3 days ago

thank you OP for allowing me the opportunity to read this entire image here on lemmy prior to seeing the creator's mastodon username, so that i could believe it was real for a minute :)

(for anyone unfamiliar with it, check out her other amazing work...)

also ping and thankyou to @NanoRaptor@bitbang.social (in case mentions on lemmy notify mastodon users?)

[-] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 days ago
[-] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 days ago

Sadly there are none I can recommend wholeheartedly, all have various problems 😢

[-] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

There are some controversial picks in there like Proton Mail or Brave. They do have a pretty wide adoption but have severe downsides. I’ll probably remove them again. What do you think?

here is a comment i wrote recently listing some of the reasons not to use proton. i'd also recommend against vivaldi (proprietary), brave (so many reasons), and everything in your messaging category besides matrix (and matrix also has lots of problems but it is the least bad of the ones you're recommending). sorry that i don't have time to elaborate right now (it's a lot), but for the inevitable "what about signal" question see my comment here and more here.

ps. if you do use signal, consider adjusting your Who Can Find Me By Number setting (see that link for a fun implementation of the attack against signal users who leave it as it is by default). note that the same thing could technically be done in matrix too, albeit by matrix ID instead of phone number. 😬

pps: here are my comments about tuta 🙄

[-] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

the suggestion that you should maybe write down an eight digit hex string "in case you need it" is just adding insult to injury. i guess anything less than a 32bit space for error codes would be insufficient

24
86
submitted 6 days ago by cypherpunks@lemmy.ml to c/world@lemmy.world
15
submitted 6 days ago by cypherpunks@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
8
submitted 1 week ago by cypherpunks@lemmy.ml to c/goodnews@lemmy.ml
14
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by cypherpunks@lemmy.ml to c/badnews@lemmy.ml

this post is actually mostly good news; the bad news is that (1) LLMs exist and will continue to be used to edit Wikipedia, and (2) Wiki Education's analysis and cleanup only covered articles created through their own programs, and (3) their system to use an LLM detector to screen new edits is only being applied to their own editors.

view more: next ›

cypherpunks

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 4 years ago
MODERATOR OF