[-] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 1 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

You are assuming that the outcome of American democracy reflects the will of the people and that voters react to politicians not meeting their needs by voting them out. That is absolutely not the case. Universal Healthcare is consistently the most important issue to voters, but no politician, not even the Democrats has ever lost their election for refusing to endorse Universal Healthcare. Additionally no politician has ever lost their job because they gave tax breaks to corporations even though there is no case where giving a tax break to Amazon, et al, improves any of their constituents lives.

Back to Healthcare, Obama Care made the insurance industry hugely rich, reduced the quality of care across all demographics, and caused the absolute healthcare crisis we are in today and yet every single idiot liberal will call it a win even if the outcomes were worse for everyone.

This goes a bit more into detail. https://www.politico.com/story/2009/12/liberals-why-didnt-obama-fight-030648

But the important part is that even though the bill did not do any of things it sought to do, Obama got to declare victory and the voters rewarded him for it. (not that they had a choice.)

[-] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

The laws only matter in as much as the company wants to make money. Otherwise yea, no company or individual has any moral or legal obligation to abide by any law and that government has no (legal) way to enforce laws on anyone outside of their jurisdiction. Ultimately companies are voluntarily abiding by laws because they do not care about anything except making money.

[-] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 day ago

Universal suffrage was a mistake. Maybe a confederation of workers councils would be better.

[-] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

There are a lot of 2026 cars that don't require a phone app. They may have other shitty internet connectivity features, but they dont' require an app. And the next time I buy a car i will 100% not be getting one that requires a phone app.

[-] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

Why would you buy anything that requires and app, let alone a car? I haven't bought a new car in a while, but if it requires and app, I'm not buying it. I bought a pergola, and originally they said I could use an app to turn the lights on. But I made them install a switch instead. Maybe consider unlinking your life for important/expensive purchases?

[-] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago

Nah that influencer is just chasing clout. He sucks. The flavor of the week is Flock, next week he'll find something else to grift about.

[-] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago

That has been my go to for a long time, but then you get people upset and demanding mods censor words and view points and of course advertisers pumping real money to people in exchange for hosting content. So it makes a mess of things :/

[-] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 days ago

Paying the vendors is how the DNC grift works. The GoP can rely on ideology, but the DNC specifically exists to funnel donations to preferred vendors while maintaining plausible deniability.

[-] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 days ago
[-] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I don't know, but I when I travel long distances for vacations and things like I try to take a train if it's available.

[-] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

That's not why these datacenters are here. The various big cloud providers (AWS/Oracle/Microsoft/Google) are perfectly able to build datacenters in the US and they do! However with the downfall of US Hegemony and the distrust that has been growing and finally come to a head with the current administration, non-US industries have been demanding "sovereign" clouds where their customer data and compute etc, doesn't live in the US and so is more resistant to US warrants and sanctions. The cloud providers want these large, rich customers (petro states), and are more then happy to build datacenters outside of US Jurisdiction. The money still flows back to the US shareholders so they don't give a shit where the physical assets are actually located.

That said Iran blowing these things up is one of the most meaningful things it can do to resist the US and eventually force a retreat.

[-] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 28 points 4 days ago

Did the Palestinian escape, or was it a suicide mission? Obviously desperation will lead to self-sacrifice, but guerrilla warfare is more effective if the perpetrators aren't caught.

6
submitted 8 months ago by PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml to c/games@lemmygrad.ml

Universal Paperclip (free at above url) Start by making paperclips, end up as a sentient AI sending Von Neuman probes out into the universe looking for more materials to create paperclip factories until you have converted the entire universe to paperclips.

Universal Paperclips is a game I just finished. Can be completed in an afternoon and it has some interesting mechanics you can engage with, there isn't a ton of "skill," as is typical for idle games, but if you do some thinking you can make more optimal decisions which will allow you to advance quicker.

One of the most important aspects of a game to me, is that it needs to end. Because of the nature of math, you can always bolt additional mechanics on to them to make the number higher, or increase the scope etc. Additionally the quintessential idle game starts with the player doing something, usually clicking. This is fine, but a good game should have the clicking portion be replaced pretty quickly with a different mechanic that is much more efficient then clicking, because clicking sucks.

Other (free) idle games I'm aware of.
https://candybox2.github.io/candybox/
https://alpha.shark.tobot.dev/

Some other goods ones that you need to pay for are Magic Research, and the even better sequel Magic Research 2.
https://store.steampowered.com/app/2311680/Magic_Research/
https://store.steampowered.com/app/2864890/Magic_Research_2/

5
submitted 11 months ago by PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml to c/usa@lemmy.ml

The idea of "student loan forgiveness for entrepreneurs" is something I noticed 10 years ago during Hillary Clinton's uninspired campaign for president, even before Trump entered the arena as a serious candidate.

Looking at a few search-engine hits filtered for only 2015, and I see the following article. There are a few other derivative articles with same idea.

https://www.nbcnews.com/better/careers/helping-millennial-entrepreneurs-conquer-student-loan-debt-n408636

But basically the idea of this group of young "entrepreneurs" who were saddled by student loans deserved special government attention. Especially from the Clinton campaign.

Kind of weird, but they had a campaign full of weird shit, like Russian Drone submarines, or a no-fly zone over Syria, or the declaration that universal health-care "will never ever happen."

But then 4 years later after Clinton was humiliated, we have her heir-apparent Kamala Harris talking about the same oddly specific policy: "According to her plan, Harris intends to give student loan debt forgiveness to Pell grant recipients who successfully open businesses in underserved communities and operate those businesses for three years."

https://psmag.com/news/kamala-harris-student-debt-forgiveness-plan-part-of-proposal-to-support-black-entrepreneurs/

And now it's 4 years later, and we have a very old representative of New York City, Nydia Velázquez introducing the same policy!

https://democrats-smallbusiness.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=4769

Who the fuck is pushing this policy? Who is it for? Why are Democratic Politicians so fixated on this fucking worthless extremely narrowly targeted policy? It's been 10 years, and this policy keeps coming back almost as a slogan. Why?!

24
submitted 1 year ago by PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml to c/fuck_cars@lemmy.ml

Garbage Island full of garbage people thinks cars prevent sexual assaults.

11
submitted 2 years ago by PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml to c/green@lemmy.ml

A pretty standard pro-environmental piece, however I do appreciate how it calls out the "German Green Party," which is obviously just an astro-turfed political party funded by the coal industry.

And of course the criticism of about the farce of Carbon Capture is spot-on.

-2
submitted 2 years ago by PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml to c/usa@lemmy.ml

A growing number of Senate Democrats appear open to making it harder for migrants to seek asylum in order to secure Republican support for aiding Ukraine and Israel.

This is what the democrats stand for. Unlimited funding for the MIC and border-control, but social issues are not a priority.

Stop voting for the parties of Capital.

view more: next ›

PowerCrazy

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 3 years ago