I saw a post that the owners of the camp removed it from flood zone maps, so they didn’t have to pay extra flood insurance. Due to this they didn’t receive adequate warning.
If this is true then how does that not make the camp owners at least somewhat at fault?
This doesn’t absolve trump either, more than one party can be at fault.
The fuck are you on about?
Holy fuck this makes so much sense and I hate it.
Have you heard his opinions on chess? He doesn’t play because it’s too easy.
It can always be explained by something else. Recency bias being a big one. It’s very possible you saw an ad yesterday as well, but didn’t notice you saw it because you haven’t talked about that item. Talk about it today, see the same ad, and now you think you’re being listened to.
It’s very possible your father googled something after hanging up the phone. There are endless ways they can connect you to knowing your father.
It’s possible someone on the same wifi network as you or your father overheard the conversation and looked it up.
All of these are far more likely than everything you say and do being recorded without anyone ever finding any definitive proof.
I want this timeline so damn bad
Probably grabs them, like the dirty little crumbgrabber he is.
I wonder if there’s a trump suppoerter out there somewhere who is deathly afraid to tell his liberal wife. What are the chances guys? 0.01%?
Anyone got a nuke? I have an idea.
Buying for $10 and selling for $20 is pretty reasonable. You do realize there are other costs than just material right? They aren’t taking home $10 on every sale.
I once posted a joke on Reddit about ironing my sack to get the wrinkles out. It got upvoted pretty heavily. Is there a chance this is my fault?