It's bad. The doctor diagnosed me with cringe.
I despise how shittily the article is written. It's written deliberately to downplay the policy and not think about how it fits into the broader eugenics agenda of starmer.
It does not force employees to stay at work and it does not cancel any benefits. The other is cutting benefits to force disabled people into work they are not fit to do.
The 2 policies are part of the same machine. The whole point is to keep more workers in the economy to boost the profit rate.
This policy in particular reduces the "excuse" that some dying and/or disabled people might have that they cannot find work because their employer fired them. This policy makes the other policy more effective, and also acts as propaganda/social conditioning to make the other policy go down more easily.
America is under attack by two foreign Sociopathic Oligarchs
On the contrary, Trump is very loyal to the american empire's interests. His whole trade war gamble shows his greater vision. Forcing the entire world to renegotiate terms and get better deals for american monopoly capitalists.
until the real enemies are purged from our society
I wouldn't say that the bourgeoise should be purged, but tamed and abolished certainly. Well, we can have a little purging as a treat.
Thw article also states that US private contractors getting 5000 shekels per house that they blow up. Truly, the forces of capital have no low they will not sink to.
My little brother is too lonely. I have to be there for him. He isn't doing well. I'll handle the situation until next summer, by which time I will probably come out.
Literally just saw a sign in my uni that says "it helps others if you are open about who you are".
This can't be a coincidence. My data is being tracked.
Living the life of a shojo protagonist.
an easier way, either just coming out or not visiting them.
T_T neither of those things are easier.
Where are you even gonna get a shovel from? "Oh hey dad can I get in the shed, I need to borrow a shovel to do something not suspicious in the woods"
Stop poking holes in my genuis plan . I'll buy my own mini shovel if I have to. I'll even use a spoon if necessary.
You jest but I learnt well how to lie to and hide things from my parents in my youth. I did mostly do so to hide my secret pokemon cards collection, but also to uh, hide my "teenage urge events", my internet history, my feelings, my friendships, what I was doing and so on.
In hindsight I should have cultivated a better relationship with my parents.
So it's just a waiting game then. Iran doesn't have to protect the site while they can build a bomb using material from other sites. Once/if they get their airspace fully defended, they can then excavate fordow.
At least I presume that's the optimistic timeline. The US/Israel might decide to attack while trying to lull the Iranians into a false sense of security. But they will only do so once they've replenished Israel's interceptors.
sodium_nitride
0 post score0 comment score
Yes, that is the policy I am talking about. The UK government wants this initiative to be expanded, so it signing onto this charter. It's a fairly standard thing for governments to trial potential policies by implementing them on their own employees. The government signing on also further normalises the initiative, giving it momentum that could be used to create a national law.
The move should be considered in a broader context. Suppose starmer's government manages to make this initiative into a national wide law. This would represent a victory for the trade unions? Certainly. Would it, in theory constitute an extra right? Yes. In a better context, would this be a nice law to have? Yeah.
However, in the context of starmer's broader eugenics agenda, it would be a win for the eugenicists. It would give them ammunition to point how the dying and disabled don't need government assistance because they can get a job and can't be fired for having a terminal illness. It plays right into that narrative in a time where the UK government knows that their disability benefit cuts are controversial.
If the government was increasing benefits, or expanding them, or making them easier to get or anything of that sort of nature, I would in fact be praising this very initiative/move.