34
submitted 19 hours ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

That button on the floor is the horn. It has reversible wicker chairs, a smoking section, and art nouveau typography on all of the original signage. This image should be large enough to read the engraving: https://i.imgur.com/BG0jG0c.jpeg

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

A .22 handgun is also good but I don't have experience with them. In fire drills I've done with a 9mm handgun and an AR-15, I was able to put more rounds on a target faster with the handgun. The only thing I don't like about practicing with the 9mm alone is that I'm not really shooting from different positions, only a standing stance. The rifle encourages you to crouch or lay down which I prefer when shooting.

edit: As for rifles, I personally love the X-22 backpacker stock for the takedown version of the 10/22: https://magpul.com/x-22-backpacker-stock-ruger-10-22-takedown.html . The rifle is so light and versatile while breaking down into a small daypack. The stock has a watertight compartment for a small survival kit. Unless I'm in grizzly bear country, it's the one gun I'd bring into the backwoods.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

CPAC’s Summit Against Human Trafficking

who-did-this we're all looking for the paedophiles

[-] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago

It's a proper deadly bullet that enters the body and bounces around without the energy to overpenetrate. Range-wise it's somewhat better than a handgun but still within 100m or so. Distance shooting is such a specialised skill and set of circumstances that you're probably a lot more likely to need to use it within that 100m than beyond it.

[-] [email protected] 20 points 2 days ago

An AR-15 or 9mm PCC would be my gold standard for one gun, with a 9mm sidearm, but for first timers I always recommend a 10/22. It's mechanically simple, ammo costs like 10% of 9mm or 5.56mm, and the recoil/sound profile are very light. To learn to shoot properly they need to shoot a lot while practicing safe handling and a 10/22 does both well.

[-] [email protected] 21 points 2 days ago

Poor Special Agent Pugjesus. That won't look good on their performance review.

[-] [email protected] 44 points 2 days ago

This is called a non-fiction book. It's like Hunger Games, but written for big kids.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago

Your own Protestant Jesus / someone to hear your slurs / someone who cares

[-] [email protected] 29 points 2 days ago

"How can I be a paedophile if AI is woke?"

100
submitted 2 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

cross-posted from: https://ibbit.at/post/8784

spoilerDonald Trump on Wednesday signed a trio of executive orders that he vowed would turn the United States into an “AI export powerhouse”, including a directive targeting what the White House described as “woke” artificial intelligence models.

The anti-woke order is part of the administration’s broader anti-diversity campaign that has also targeted federal agencies, academic institutions and the military. “The American people do not want woke Marxist lunacy in the AI models, and neither do other countries,” Trump said during remarks at an AI summit in Washington on Wednesday.

Trump also signed orders aimed at expediting federal permitting for datacentre infrastructure and promoting the export of American AI models. The executive actions coincide with the Trump administration’s release of a broader, 24-page “AI action plan” that seeks to expand the use of AI in the federal government as well as position the US as the global leader in artificial intelligence.

“Winning this competition will be a test of our capacities unlike anything since the dawn of the space age,” Trump told an audience of AI industry leaders, adding: “We need US technology companies to be all-in for America. We want you to put America first.”

The metrics of what make an AI model politically biased are extremely contentious and open to interpretation, however, and therefore may allow the administration to use the order to target companies at its own discretion.

The action plan, titled “Winning the Race”, is a long-promised document that was announced shortly after Trump took office and repealed a Biden administration order on AI that mandated some safeguards and standards on the technology. It outlines the White House’s vision for governing artificial intelligence in the US, vowing to speed up the development of the fast-growing technology by removing “red tape and onerous regulation”.

During his remarks, Trump also proposed a more nominal change. “I can’t stand it,” he said, referring to the use of the word “artificial”. “I don’t even like the name, you know? I don’t like anything that’s artificial. So could we straighten that out, please? We should change the name. I actually mean that.”

“It’s not artificial. It’s genius,” he added.

A second order Trump signed on Wednesday calls for deregulating AI development, increasing the building of datacentres and removing environmental protections that could hamper their construction.

Datacentres that house the servers for AI models require immense amounts of water and energy to function, as well as produce greenhouse gas emissions. Environmental groups have warned about harmful increases to air and noise pollution as tech companies build more facilities, while a number of local communities have pushed back against their construction.

In addition to easing permitting laws and emphasizing the need for more energy infrastructure, both measures that tech companies have lobbied for, Trump’s order also frames the AI race as a contest for geopolitical dominance. China has invested billions into the manufacturing of AI chips and datacentres to become a competitor in the industry, while Chinese companies such as Deepseek have released AI models that rival Silicon Valley’s output.

While Trump’s plan seeks to address fears of China as an AI superpower, the Trump administration’s move against “woke” AI echoes longstanding conservative grievances against tech companies, which Republicans have accused of possessing liberal biases and suppressing rightwing ideology. As generative AI has become more prominent in recent years, that criticism has shifted from concerns over internet search results or anti-misinformation policies into anger against AI chatbots and image generators.

One of the biggest critics of perceived liberal bias in AI is Elon Musk, who has vowed to make his xAI company and its Grok chatbot “anti-woke”. Although Musk and Donald Trump are still locked in a feud after their public falling out last month, Musk may stand to benefit from Trump’s order given his emphasis on controlling AI’s political outputs.

Musk has consistently criticized AI models, including his own, for failing to generate what he sees as sufficiently conservative views. He has claimed that xAI has reworked Grok to eliminate liberal bias, and the chatbot has occasionally posted white supremacist and antisemitic content. In May, Grok affirmed white supremacist conspiracies that a “white genocide” was taking place in South Africa and said it was “instructed by my creators” to do so. Earlier this month, Grok also posted pro-Nazi ideology andremoved fantasies while identifying itself as “MechaHitler” until the company was forced to intervene.

Despite Grok’s promotion of Nazism, xAI was among several AI companies that the Department of Defense awarded with up to $200m contracts this month to develop tools for the government. OpenAI, Anthropic and Google, all of which have their own proprietary AI models, were the other recipients.

Conservatives have singled out incidents such as Google’s Gemini image generator inaccurately producing racially diverse depictions of historical figures such as German second world war soldiers as proof of liberal bias. AI experts have meanwhile long warned about problems of racial and gender bias in the creation of artificial intelligence models, which are trained on content such as social media posts, news articles and other forms of media that may contain stereotypes or discriminatory material that gets incorporated into these tools. Researchers have found that these biases have persisted despite advancements in AI, with models often replicating existing social prejudices in their outputs.

Conflict over biases in AI have also led to turmoil in the industry. In 2020, the co-lead of Google’s “ethical AI” team Timnit Gebru said she was fired after she expressed concerns of biases being built into the company’s AI models and a broader lack of diversity efforts at the company. Google said she resigned.

[-] [email protected] 42 points 2 days ago

I don't like Dengism in principle, but it worked so I have to adjust my principles to account for praxis challenging theory shrug-outta-hecks

93
submitted 3 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
[-] [email protected] 31 points 3 days ago

Hard agree. No penis NO PURCHASE. Bring back the original 151 in their ORIGINAL form, with FULL PENIS.

38
submitted 5 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Come on gang. It makes sense.

42
submitted 6 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

In this video we return to West Oakland, California to inspect the illegally-planted (but eventually authorized by the city) garden on Mandela Parkway, giving it a full species survey of rarities that were planted there including the Big Cone Pinion Pine, Pinus maximartinezii, as well as the inglorious Puya x berteroniana, Agave vilmoriniana (Octopus Agave), Quercus rugosa (Mexican net leaf oak) and many more.

We also check out some of the trees planted on side streets, including dawn redwoods, giant sequoias, and coast redwoods

[suburbia] stalin-gun-1 ecoterrorist

19
submitted 6 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

LA's autonomy and safety are being threatened with violence from local and federal sources. But that only draws the community more closely together in solidarity. LA is doing what it's best at, hanging out at the park, eating good food, being annoying, creating traffic, and shooting content!

As Angelenos came together to defend our rights and demand self-governance, the streets filled with the sounds of chants, music, and sizzling griddles. I joined the movement and tasted the flavors of resistance:

🍦 Nieve Artesanal – sweet, cold, and made with love by a local vendor. 🍩 Churros – crispy, golden, and shared freely among strangers who became friends. 🌭 LA Street Dog – bacon-wrapped and smothered in grilled onions, as iconic as the city itself.

This wasn’t just a protest—it was a celebration of community, resilience, and the right to be heard.

4
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

what the fuck is that about.

18
(Cw: ableism) The Ugly Law (en.m.wikipedia.org)
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

From 1867 to 1974, various cities of the United States had unsightly beggar ordinances, retroactively named ugly laws.[1] These laws targeted poor people and disabled people. For instance, in San Francisco a law of 1867 deemed it illegal for "any person, who is diseased, maimed, mutilated or deformed in any way, so as to be an unsightly or disgusting object, to expose himself or herself to public view."[2][1] Exceptions to public exposure were acceptable only if the people were subjects of demonstration, to illustrate the separation of disabled from nondisabled and their need for reformation.[3]: 47

20
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

This region of Colorado, maybe an hour's drive from where this was taken, is where Chronic Wasting Disease was first detected. Our Cervidae species naturally change their elevation based on seasonal habitat availability. They go into the Rockies during high summer when they can forage without snow and retreat to the front range when it's too cold to survive any higher.

The front range was immediately colonised by cattle ranchers and farmers. The ecocide of the bison degraded that land on top of industrial agriculture's impact, as their foraging patterns are different. Between fencing, irresponsible hunting, calorie loss, wildfire/water policy, and the urban development of the front range/foothills the Cervidae were concentrated in the least desirable pieces of high elevation land. Their most genetically healthy were killed for trophies while the isolated breeding pools created what will be dementia covid at some point. CWD is the most horrifying disease I know of and it comes from denying habitat.

I like that this city-managed natural area manages to balance habitat with accessible low-impact hiking. It has a tremendous number of birds and insects. The native grasses are healthy despite recent heatwaves, so the deer and elk can actually seasonally migrate to quality grazing land. It was full of currants and dozens of our 946 native bee species and dead trees pockmarked by woodpeckers. If we had just done this from the start, the world would have been spared The Big One.

35
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

One of my favourite native wildflowers, Cleomella serrulata. I saw a few dozen of them today that were covered in a mixture of native bees, wasps, ants, and beetles. There was a really healthy and diverse bird population in that natural area as a result of the robust insect populations and fruiting shrubs.

145
submitted 2 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

I hate golf so much that I'm writing a book which features it. It's ecocide as much as it is wholesale genocide for the benefit of sociopaths. As a big urban greenspace guy, they're uniquely infuriating.

Unfortunately I have to do the horticulture at a couple municipal ones. Today I'm pruning the shrubs in one of them and feel a thud against my shoulder. Some golfer hit a ball at full power (160 kph~) in my direction while I'm wearing high visibility gear, somehow hit me with it, and somehow missed bone. It went between my scapula and spine/neck/skull so it's just a really painful bruise. The guy spontaneously came over to apologise which was good enough for me.

Actually feeling physical pain from golf is a whole new dimension of reasons to hate golf. I could always separate myself from it and golfers, but now it's personal. Golf courses aren't just drastically increasing my chance of developing horrific illnesses. They actually made me want to fight a specific person representing all the reasons I hate golf.

If I was a Menshevik hater of golf before, now I am become Bolshevik the destroyer of golf. I fucking hate golf with three asterisks.

9
submitted 2 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

https://www.laphil.com/musicdb/pieces/1441/concerto-in-f

In addition to continuing to satisfy a large public clamoring for more of his sweet and tender, buoyant and rambunctious songs that could be sung, whistled, and hummed, George Gershwin took another foray into the classics in 1925. This one, the Concerto in F for Piano and Orchestra, was even more ambitious than the previous year’s Rhapsody in Blue: a full-fledged concerto in time-honored three-movement form and a work that was all Gershwin, down to his own orchestration, which had not been the case with Rhapsody in Blue.

Those who thought Tin Pan Alley’s super-composer had gotten the “serious” bug out of his system with Rhapsody were wrong—in a way. Although the phenomenally talented and successful songwriter turned in earnest to the serious musical forms of concerto, symphonic poem (An American in Paris), and opera (Porgy and Bess), he didn’t change his musical persona for the concert hall—no split personality for Gershwin. Whereas most American composers of his era, many of whom had far more traditional musical training, were writing in the fashionable European styles, Gershwin cultivated his mother tongue—the one truly original American vernacular: jazz.

It may be true that Gershwin’s style has a highly polished commercial veneer, compared with what is considered real—that is, improvisational—jazz. Still, there is no denying the strength and vitality of the Gershwin product, in whatever form it appears. As for the Concerto in F, it is jazz all the way and a remarkable achievement for a 27-year-old tunesmith.

The Paris connection was extremely important for Gershwin. His admiration for French music is certainly made tangible in the Concerto’s Adagio second movement. An extended (46-bar) introduction confined almost exclusively to winds and brass (no piano at all) conjures an ambience that goes directly to the heart of Debussy and Ravel. Thematically, the main tune that finally emerges in the piano is hinted at early in the introduction by a muted trumpet. The fascinating manipulations of this theme by piano and orchestra and the figurations and filigree that evolve from it show Gershwin at his most inventive and bracing. The construction of the movement is highly original, with the reappearance of the introduction prefacing a piano cadenza that in turn leads into the “big” tune of the movement—a Gershwin song that is, well, irresistibly Gershwin. The melody is given the grand concerto treatment until it is cut off abruptly for a nostalgic, abbreviated return of the motif from the introduction, this time intriguingly scored for piano and flute.

The outer movements are, expectedly, fast ones that the composer, in a brief analytical note, described as follows:

“The first movement employs the Charleston rhythm. It is quick and pulsating, representing the young, enthusiastic spirit of American life. It begins with a rhythmic motif given out by the kettle drums, supported by the other percussion instruments and with a Charleston motif introduced by bassoon, horns, clarinets, and violas. The principal theme is announced by the bassoon. Later a second theme is introduced by the piano.

“The second movement has a poetic, nocturnal atmosphere which has come to be referred to as the American blues, but in a purer form than that in which they are usually treated.

“The final movement reverts to the style of the first. It is an orgy of rhythms, starting violently and keeping the same pace throughout.” —Orrin Howard

Orchestration: piccolo, 2 flutes, 2 oboes, English horn, 2 clarinets, bass clarinet, 2 bassoons, 4 horns, 3 trumpets, 3 trombones, tuba, timpani, bass drum, snare drum, cymbals, bells, xylophone, triangle, and strings

view more: next ›

happybadger

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 4 years ago