[-] [email protected] 9 points 15 hours ago

some HTS fighter got his nephew in the west to whip up something on a pirated copy of adobe illustrator and got it changed before anyone else could notice.

[-] [email protected] 47 points 15 hours ago

Were what, 6 months into the trump presidency? Literally a quarter of his term and he's done cataclysmic damage to the US in terms of economy, education, human rights, election integrity, and god knows what else.

This "big beautiful bill" is a drop in the ocean for what Trump has accomplished and will continue to accomplish. But liberals will run in 2029 on a campaign that promises to maybe overturn the last 5-10% of whatever trump is up to in office.

The previous 90%, including most of this bill, sweeping cuts to the civil service, totally undermining the few departments that had some semblance of public good instilled onto them, the elevation of ICE into a paramilitary race police... that's all going to stay. Unless some kind of revolutionary force overturns the state, I could guarantee everything that happens from here until maybe mid-2027 is going to stay unchanged until they're made worse by some new ghoul.

The US is a shopping mall of stores that are all slowly shutting up shop for good. What remains is a liminal husk of what was, and the question of who will replace the lights when they burn out.

[-] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Absolutely agree. I do however think it says a lot about the poor state of class struggle that this is imo still the closest to the nucleus of such a movement, especially in an age where surveillance and infiltration are rife.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

EDIT: they abstained.

Did Plaid Cymru abstain? I cannot find the proscription vote on any of their voting records, which I would have expected to be there under "abstain". Im aware Welsh MPs cannot vote on certain bills in England.

Liz Saville Roberts, for example, spoke in commons against the proscription, but didn't actually have a vote recorded for it. Any electoralist heads know more?

[-] [email protected] 46 points 1 day ago

Direct Actionists have already begun to change tactics, launching actions in the name of "Yvette Cooper" (UK Home Secretary, basically a Secretary of State) which they will argue is a totally different organisation.

Not sure how that works legally-speaking but a lot of far right orgs just "disbanded" following proscription and then started again. PA has the advantage of being able to do that whilst having an non-hierarchical organising strategy that limits risk to organisers and empowers actionists to continue the movement under pressure from the state.

With an active campaign underway, unlike the fash that usually wait around for a chance to riot, the momentum can continue under any name actionists choose, and they dont really need much funding to maintain it. I cannot make predictions, but I do hope that YC (lol) has a fruitful and not-at-all-afiliated career in disrupting the war machine.

[-] [email protected] 26 points 1 day ago

Yeah this only escalates the risk appetite of actionists who were always playing the long game of less-violent actions to rely on the lenience of the courts: Most of which have largely absolved actionists apart from explicit cases (ie. The Filton 18) where the Israeli govt. requested harsher responses from the state.

I disagree with the suggestion that proscription only came from the RAF raid. The British state was toying with the idea ever since the org began smashing drones in Elbit's factories. As I said already, some actionists are already held under terrorism charges!

This proscription was inevitable following a months of momentum towards PA's goals and a number of victories for the wider movement. The raid may have catalysed the state, but the current field situation would be little different in any universe where those planes were never vandalised.

[-] [email protected] 33 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yeah i disagree with the entire premise. The only performative UK groups on Palestine are the PSC and the SWP.

They used a massive diversity of tactics to meet actionists' risk appetite, and managed to shutdown 30% of Elbit's official locations in the UK. All whilst isolating Elbit from the UK economy via targeting their suppliers, insurers, landlords. Even getting Barclays bank to shift on its israeli/elbit investments was a major victory for the BDS movement.

Pal Action is about as close to a socialist vanguard that the English people have seen in a generation.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago
  1. Russia cant build them very quickly and is at war.

  2. not much?

  3. Probably not unless they do it all in house? Israel has more stealth aircraft than Iran has all aircraft atm.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago

factory lines for anything beyond basic small arms are gonna take too long to build to impact the war for Ukraine.

Takes years to reverse industrial and engineering capacity when its basically shit itself to death for decades.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago

there's medical and scientific reasons to go higher too right? But yes the stockpiling of HEU was always a dipomatic threat used to punish the US for reneging on the JCPOA.

[-] [email protected] 22 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

It's going to be a long decade

yeah some weeks can feel like that

[-] [email protected] 25 points 4 days ago

I love how the democrats are so spineless their grand plan is to make a crappy imitation of some thinktank whitepaper over a weekend on a shared microsoft word document. It wont get distributed because no one can figure out how to save it as .pdf

8
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

So I've been pushing back against the culture at my job slowly moving against WFH: Increasing pressure on certain staff to travel in on their own dime; "collab days" that the CEO is pushing teams to adopt despite their insistence that no one wants to come in; constant comments, snide remarks, and attitude that the CEO has made that see WFH as a benefit that the company offers at a cost.

Our contract claims to have a provision to move our hybrid contract to permanent remote after our probation ends. In reality, HR twiddles their thumbs and never offers it. The wider policy, while HR tells staff is "never expecting anyone to come in", explicitly allows such a scenario where one could be mandated to come in should the business justify it.

Of course, under most circumstances many of us would have little recourse (or believe as such). However, an off the record comment by my line manager pointed me to the Equality Act 2010 and reasonable adjustments. Since I've got ADHD, I do have some leverage here.


You do not need to necessarily be disabled to request a reasonable adjustment (or any protected characteristic to request WFH) as the Equality Act also accommodates for carers, pregnant people, and those with a chronic or long term illness.

Employers usually must make adjustments that are reasonable, and must justify why if not; this can be escalated to a tribunal to legally mandate the change if necessary,

https://www.scope.org.uk/advice-and-support/reasonable-adjustments-at-work

https://www.acas.org.uk/reasonable-adjustments


Does anyone here have experience with Reasonable Adjustments at work? Fighting to keep WFH? Employer give you shit? I'm interested in all of it!

75
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

this is the second time I've done this. i do not like this weasely little man. i am gonna unionise the fucken place to spite him then quit anyway. ruined my fucken day

58
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

The feeling I assumed was anxiety my whole life was gone. The uneasy feeling of dread or that I was forgetting something of terminal importance. The way stuff bounced around in my head and made me ruminate on unnecessary things. I just never had a word for it before now.

This whole time I've been in SNRIs that are supposed to help with the same things, but never quite did enough.

I'm only 2 weeks in and it isnt like taking the limitless pill or anything but even just that is a relief rn 🥹

17
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
20
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

More SpoilersIt's actually scientific how the management managed to install enough scarcity to keep some of the cheerleaders as snitches, then isolated the leader(s) and made them give pledges of loyalty to the leadership, then managed to convince everyone that it was their choice to totally fold and that submitting to the boss was empowerment.

There is nothing more impressive but also insane seeing a team of world-famous athletes saying their 40 hour work weeks are "part time". A masterpiece of capitalist propaganda that quietly admits the quiet part out loud.

Oh yeah and there's some other amaericanbrain shit that are sending mt brain matter out my ears and eyes.

85
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
13
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
22
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

2 out of the 3 smart plugs I've bought in the last couple of years have shit themselves for whatever reason. One just doesnt turn off, the other bricked itself after moving house (???)

If anyone here has used any smart plugs that havent died within a couple of years I'd love to know. I'm only using them for lamps that are a prick to reach. Bonus points for any that dont require bullshit apps to set them up

PS: UK But I guess I can find similar models if you got em

50
submitted 2 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

This vote adds an amendment to the police and crime bill being debated in parliament. It will decriminalise abortions (at any stage) which have lead to arbitrary police harassment of women, including those who have miscarried.

It will still penalise doctors and other third parties if they provide assistance to abortions beyond 24 weeks ("late term" abortions) where the law was consistently enforced on women unless under extenuating circumstances.

The current law in England and Wales states that abortion is illegal but allowed up to the first 24 weeks of pregnancy and beyond that in certain circumstances such as if the woman's life is in danger.

Another amendment of this nature included one to scrap all abortion-related clauses of the 1861 act that originally outlawed abortion. This would have made abortion totally legal (not just decriminalised) but was not put to vote.

One amendment attempted by the Conservative shadow (opposition) health minister tried to ban access to abortion pills without an in-person consultation (would ban abortion pills via postal chemist services) but was defeated by a strong margin.

view more: next ›

aanes_appreciator

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 3 months ago