[-] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago

Is the arrow really necessary?

[-] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

ACAB (All Communists Are Beautiful)

8
submitted 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

I have some serious scuffing on my car's door sill. I bought some black xpel film to prevent this in the future, but I want to do something to prevent rust from forming underneath the film.

I bought some color matched touch up paint, but I'm wondering if I need to remove all of the paint and primer from the area. Since I don't care how it'll look under the film, I'd like to just rough it up with sandpaper, prime and paint it, and then slap the film on it.

The part I'm worried about is that it's a fairly large and irregular scuffed area. Some bits are down to metal, some down to primer, and some still has the clearcoat. I can't really mask it off and only get primer on bare metal and the original primer.

The reason I don't want to sand it all down is that it's a difficult area to sand. I'm worried I'll fuck up the paint beyond the area that would be covered by the film.

Can I do it the lazy way, or should I just bite the bullet and sand down to metal?

It's water based touch up paint if that matters.

24
submitted 2 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
77
submitted 2 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Dear House Centipede,

I appreciate your effort to hold up your obligations under our lease agreement. As you know, I provide you with free rent in exchange for your diligent efforts to eat any insects that may come into the house. Your immense size tells me you've been keeping up your end of the bargain.

I am writing to you about the incident this morning. Our agreement states that we must avoid each other at all costs. While I was brushing my teeth, you came scurrying out of the sink drain. Please avoid doing this in the future, as it creeped the hell out of me.

I thank your for your attention to this matter.

17
submitted 3 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Tl;Dr: Took a loaner car and noticed damage several days later. Should I try to weasel out, or offer to pay something?


My car is in for body work and the shop gave me a loaner. It's a really poor condition Subaru SUV.

I've been driving it and today I noticed really weird damage to the fender. Looks like someone flung a rock or something heavy at the fender. The paint is flaking and the edge of the door has a little chip. The thing is, I have no idea if the damage was there when I picked it up. Probably wasn't because I think I would have noticed it by now.

It seems unlikely it was that way when I got it. There's a bunch of ground bare metal with no rust. You'd think a body shop guy would at least hit it with some paint to prevent rust.

I don't even see how this damage could have happened from a parking lot hit and run, and I didn't hit anything. There's a very deep round dent at the top of the fender, but the lower fender sticks out farther and isn't damaged at all. I don't think it was damaged while parked at my house, either. I have a narrow driveway. Whatever hit this came with serious force.

The only paperwork I have is a handwritten thing on one of those carbon copy receipts. It has my contact info, the mileage and vin of the vehicle and one line that says, "Customer is responsible for any and all damage to vehicle". I signed at the bottom.

Should I be straight up and tell him about it? Should I offer to pay something? It's a little shop and the guy has been pretty good to me. On the other hand, it could be a pretty expensive fix if the guy wants to milk it. To be returned to new condition it would need a new fender and paint on 2 panels.

I can't imagine the entire car is worth more than $4000. It has bad brakes, bad suspension, bad transmission, bad interior, etc. Its a 2018 with 156k miles.

Part of me thinks I should just return it and hope they don't notice right away, but it's kind of a cowardly move. Another option is to point out the damage and see what he says, and if he's unreasonable, force him to sue me/claim against my insurance.

I can afford it, but it also sucks to have to pay thousands for some parking lot hit and run or even damage that was there before I took it.

Any advice, ethical or practical?

17
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
[-] [email protected] 48 points 2 months ago

They did the same thing with trucking. Told everyone it was a solid middle class career in dire need of workers. Convinced a bunch of states and the feds to foot the bill for truck driving schools.

They never needed more drivers, what they needed was more people to sucker in to predatory truck leases. They get new graduates to sign a lease for a truck. The lease forces them to only work for the company that leases them the truck, forcing them to accept whatever mileage rate the company decides to give them. Once the driver gets sick of that, the company takes the truck and leases it to the next person they recruit directly from trucking school(paid for by the government).

51
submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
16
submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
68
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

tl;drThey're planning to under declare the value of goods. If a company doesn't want that, the sellers will handle the shipment on both ends, bringing it through customs at a lower value and then deliver it.

How do other countries deal with this?

33
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

I need to find a job in the next few months. I'd been eyeing a particular part time position that would be really good for me, but I procrastinated a bit. When I got my resume and cover letter together, the job had disappeared from indeed and their website.

The same organization had a somewhat similar position still open, but with full time hours. I'm coming back into the workforce after 15+ years on disability, so I prefer part time at least to start. But the part time job was gone, so I reworked the cover letter and submitted it for the full time position.

This morning I checked and the part time position is back on both sites and says, "Hiring multiple candidates". These jobs have been open for over 6 motnhs, this is a hard area to hire in, especially given the wages.

The full-time position doesn't have any contact information listed, so there's nobody I can email and say, "Would you also consider me for (other position)?". It's not a large organization. I'd be surprised if the hiring manager was even a different person, but only the part time listing had contact information listed.

Should I just submit for the other position? Or wait and see if I get an interview/hired before applying for the other? I get the impression that they'd rather fill the full-time position, and it's a better fit for my resume/skills. I don't think it would look good to immediately apply for the part-time position after selling myself as the perfect person for the full time.

They haven't even had 1 business day to consider my first application. Indeed says they normally respond within 1 business day, but I don't know how trustworthy that is.

So, should I apply or wait a bit?

2
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

spoiler

A New Jersey police chief has been accused of defecating on floors, spiking the department coffee with viagra and adderall, and stabbing an officer’s penis with a hypodermic needle among other assualt and harassment claims filed in a complaint.

Chief Robert Farley, the appointed chief of the North Bergen Police Department as of February 2024, was also accused of retaliating and punishing officials who dared to report him to the New Jersey Attorney General, NJ.com reported.

The five police officers—Special Captain Michael F. Derrin, Detective Michael A. Derrin, Lt. Alex Guzman, Officer Rasheed Siyam, and Officer Christopher Bowen—plan to sue over the police chief’s alleged behavior.

“I’ve never seen anything like this in my life,” Patrick Toscano, the attorney who filed the claims on behalf of the police officers, said NJ.com reported.

The list of complaints detailed a toxic work culture wherein Farley thrived on pranking, insulting, and scaring officers. While some alleged offenses included relatively innocuous gags like applying ink to door handles and setting off car alarms, other more serious allegations include Farley using racial slurs, sending sex toys to an officer’s house, and exposing himself to staffers.

A town spokesperson denied all claims made by the officers in a statement to the Daily Beast.

“The Township of North Bergen has full confidence in Chief Robert Farley’s leadership of the North Bergen Police Department and we strongly deny these false and outrageous allegations made by disgruntled officers who are resorting to attacking the reputation of a dedicated public servant to further their own selfish goals,” the statement read.

They added, “If these claims are advanced in a lawsuit the Township will vigorously defend North Bergen taxpayers against these blatant cash grabs and prove that the allegations are false and defamatory. In order to avoid the appearance of a conflict of interest and because we are fully confident that these claims will be proven false, we have proactively referred them to the Hudson County Prosecutor’s Office for review.”

Meanwhile, officers also claim that Farley’s abusive behavior had been going on for years and has persisted since he was promoted as chief. Prior to this, he served with the department for 26 years, in the footsteps of his father and grandfather, who both served as deputy chiefs.

When Farley, who makes over $228,000 a year based on pension records, first became the department’s head, he made promises that his 123-member department might now call empty.

“I will strive to lead the officers of our department to be an accessible component of our community while maintaining their competency, transparency, and professionalism,” Farley said in the statement at the time.

Special Captain Michael F. Derrin, 59, who was assigned to Farley’s office in 2023 according to court documents, claims that the chief’s demeanor towards him changed in August 2024 despite their friendship.

“Chief Farley chases me around his office,” Derrin wrote in his notice. “After cornering me in the filing area with no further room for retreat, he sticks a hypodermic needle through my jeans into the tip of my penis.” According to Derrin’s account, the needle drew his blood.

But wait, there’s more.

“The chief would shave his body hair on people’s property, their persons, and their food,” Derrin wrote. “He was also fond of scraping fluids from his underwear onto people seated in the chief’s office.” He added that when he tried to complain to the state Attorney General’s Office, a captain called him and fired him.

Derrin’s son, Detective Michael A. Derrin, claims he witnessed Farley unload a fistful of viagra and adderall into the coffee pot, stir it till they dissolved, and then wait for someone to drink a cup. The detective said he stuck to a K-Cup machine out of fear afterwards.

“Chief Farley has, on several occasions, pulled his pants down and defecated on the floor in front of his entire office staff,” Lt. Alex Guzman wrote in his complaint. “He has also left feces on the bathroom floor, apparently with the intent of having someone unknowingly step on it.” He added that the Hudson County chief would also defecate in wastebaskets near the desks of other officers.

Guzman also complained about the emotional distress his family members were subjected to when the police chief sent sex toys, intimate lotions, and gay pride flags to his home.

168
submitted 6 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Lol

67
submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Body camera footage obtained by Kentucky Public Radio shows that as Lt. Caleb Stewart walked closer, the woman yelled, “I might be going into labor, is that okay?”

Her water had broken, she said. “I’m leaking out,” she told him. She grabbed a blanket and a few personal effects as a bright orange city dump truck pulled up to remove the makeshift bed.

The woman had no phone. She said her husband went to call an ambulance, so Stewart called one for her. But as she walked toward the street to wait for help, Stewart yelled at her to stop.

“Am I being detained?” she asked.

“Yes, you’re being detained,” he shouted. “You’re being detained because you’re unlawfully camping.”

Stewart was enforcing a new state law that bans street camping — essentially, a person may not sleep, intend to sleep, or set up camp on undesignated public property like sidewalks or underneath overpasses. He has issued the majority of the citations for unlawful camping in Louisville.

“So I don’t for a second believe that this woman is going into labor,” he said.

He returned to find the woman sitting on the ground, with legs askew and labored breathing, waiting for the ambulance. Stewart hands her a citation, and she balls it up and tosses it aside as the ambulance arrives to take her to the hospital.

“You’re all horrible people,” she said, as she got to her feet. “I’m glad y’all got this job to f*** with the homeless and not help society.”

Later that day she gave birth to her child, according to her attorney, Public Defender Ryan Dischinger. He said both the woman and her son are healthy three months later, and the family is now in shelter without assistance from LMPD or the court system.

“The reality for her, and for anyone who’s homeless in Kentucky, is that they’re constantly and unavoidably breaking this law,” Dischinger said. “What she needed was help and compassion and instead she was met with violence.”

Now, she’s waiting for a late January trial date on her citation, which could carry a fine and requires the people charged with street camping, who are mostly homeless individuals, to appear before a judge.

[-] [email protected] 54 points 8 months ago

Even if I had someone I could trust enough, I wouldn't tell them. It's not fair to burden someone with keeping that level of secret.

[-] [email protected] 70 points 9 months ago

You have to be a pretty big psycho to volunteer for war for free. It's not even patriotism, it's just war tourism.

Rest in piss bozo

[-] [email protected] 52 points 10 months ago

I saw an article about how rich people build museums attached to their homes. They get a tax deduction from the building costs, and don't have to pay property taxes on that part. They use them for private parties, weddings, etc.

They're supposed to be open to the public, but of course nobody from the government checks into that. The reporter wasn't able to get into any of them.

I'm assuming that's what the "philanthropy wing" is about.

[-] [email protected] 49 points 11 months ago

In Douglas Rushkoff's book "Survival of the Richest" he talks about the survival ideas of these rich morons he talked to at some event. They were discussing strategies to keep security guards loyal in a post apocalyptic scenario. Shit like shock collars, timed safes, anything besides treating them well. It's a good book.

They'd rather keep driving us towards an apocalypse they wouldn't survive than do something to avoid it.

[-] [email protected] 82 points 11 months ago

Texas is the champ at letting private industry profit from government.

They built a toll road with $1Billion in public money, using a private equity firm to build it which resulted in large profits, and hazardous work conditions. Then they sold 50 years of toll rights to a different private equity firm for $600mil, with no limit to how much could be charged. When tolls predictably skyrocketed, they had to buy those rights back for $1.7 billion after the firm had collected tolls for 5 years.

[-] [email protected] 56 points 11 months ago

I don't agree with this. It's a bummer when your favorite piracy source goes down, but telling people is the only way other people find out. I want everyone, especially poor people, to know how to easily access pirated stuff.

The IP lawyers are always going to find it anyway, and new sources come pretty quick when the old ones die.

[-] [email protected] 56 points 2 years ago

Best part of being the vice president is you get to tap into the US strategic reserve of quaaludes

[-] [email protected] 55 points 2 years ago

Neither of those points make sense. The label didn't say, "This chip might kill you".

Nor is there evidence that the guy ate the equivalent of 3 bottles of whiskey in hot chips. The story I read implied he ate one chip, which is the amount the manufacturer intended you to eat, since they come in packages of one.

view more: next ›

LanyrdSkynrd

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 2 years ago