71

France 24

"Washington offered to kill the leaders of jihadist groups, in exchange for access to lithium and gold for American businesses," said Ulf Laessing, head of the Sahel programme at the Konrad Adenauer Foundation, a think tank affiliated with Germany's conservative CDU party.

Under President Donald Trump the United States has reset relations with west Africa's military leaders on a mutual back-scratching basis, bartering help fighting jihadists for the Sahel region's mining riches, experts say.

While Joe Biden was in office the US suspended most of the development and military aid it sent to Burkina Faso, Mali and Niger in the wake of the rash of coups that brought juntas to power in the three restive countries between 2020 and 2023.

Trump's return to the White House has shifted the US away from that stance, as part of a wider pivot in Washington's African foreign policy and its attempts to counter Russia and China's influence on the continent.

"Trade, not aid ... is now truly our policy for Africa," Troy Fitrell, the State Department's top official for African affairs, told an audience in Abidjan, Ivory Coast in May.

In recent weeks several other senior American figures have paid visits to the capitals of Burkina Faso, Mali and Niger, which have all been struggling to root out jihadists linked to al Qaeda or the Islamic State group for more than a decade.

In early July, Rudolph Atallah, a security and counterterrorism adviser to Trump, visited Mali to offer the "American solution" for the unrest.

"We have the necessary equipment, the intelligence and the forces to stand up to this menace. If Mali decides to work with us, we'll know what to do," Atallah was quoted as saying by the country's state newspaper.

Several days later, William B. Stevens, the State Department's deputy assistant secretary for West Africa, likewise raised the possibility of private American investment in the anti-jihadist fight to an audience in the Malian capital Bamako, after stop-offs in Ouagadougou and Niamey.

"Washington offered to kill the leaders of jihadist groups, in exchange for access to lithium and gold for American businesses," said Ulf Laessing, head of the Sahel programme at the Konrad Adenauer Foundation, a think tank affiliated with Germany's conservative CDU party.

Trump has brought US access to key minerals front and centre of his negotiations with foreign countries, including in his attempts to end the Russia-Ukraine war and the long-running conflict between Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of Congo. Lithium, gold, uranium

Mali is among Africa's top producers of gold and lithium, a key component in the electric car batteries necessary for the transition to a low-carbon economy in the age of climate change.

Burkina Faso likewise possesses rich veins of gold, while Niger's uranium deposits make the desert nation among the world's top exporters of the radioactive metal.

Although all three Sahel juntas came to power while promising the people greater control and sovereignty over their country's mineral wealth, the officers in charge have welcomed Washington's change in tack.

"We have to look at investment, the potential of our countries," said Mali's Foreign Minister Abdoulaye Diop in July, hailing "today's convergence of viewpoints between the American administration and the government of Mali".

Laessing argued that "some officials in the State Department, worried about the end of USAID and the closure of embassies, pointed out Mali's rich resources to the Trump administration as a way to encourage it to remain engaged and keep the American embassy in Bamako open, at a point where Russia and China are expanding their influence in the region."

But for Liam Karr, an analyst at the American Enterprise Institute, any critical minerals deal would be "a much longer-term project".

"The terrorism threat is the biggest issue ... stabilising the region is key to any investment hopes," Karr argued. 'American mercenaries'

Washington's courting of the Sahel states comes despite the juntas pivoting towards Russia, having cut ties with the West and former imperial ruler France in particular since the coups.

Moscow has sent mercenaries from the infamous Wagner paramilitary organisation, and its successor the Africa Corps, to help the Sahel countries' armies push back the jihadists.

After Niger nationalised the local branch of French uranium giant Orano, the Kremlin, which commands the world's largest arsenal of nuclear weapons, said it wished to mine the radioactive metal in the west African country itself.

So far, Russia's foothold in the region has yet to provoke the White House's ire.

In his visit to Mali, security adviser Atallah said he saw no problem with Moscow's presence in the region, insisting that the country was "free to choose its partners".

"Since the French were kicked out ... and Russia welcomed into the region, Trump sees no problem in accompanying and/or supporting Russian efforts in the region. The fact that the Russians eschew democratic values and human rights promotion also aligns with the Trump administration's transactional approach to relations between states," Bisa Williams, a former US ambassador to Niger, told AFP.

Williams, now a consultant and academic, said Trump could strike an agreement that "would guarantee majority or near-majority ownership and a high percentage of extracted minerals in exchange for support fighting terrorism".

That could involve the deployment of American mercenaries, along the lines of how Russia used Wagner, Williams said.

"That way, he wouldn't have to defend the policy before Congress or his MAGA base."

all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] kristina@hexbear.net 47 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Fund Islamic terrorist groups to destabilize region -> offer to kill Islamic terrorist groups -> Get new colonies without a large scale invasion

[-] TrippyFocus@lemmy.ml 23 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Yeah I’m hoping the leadership in each country turns this down. What’s the point of kicking the French out if your just going to jump back into the neocolonial pit by selling the country to the US?

I’m optimistic though since all that’s been said is that the US has offered this deal. If I’m remembering correctly Burkina Faso recently got military equipment from China so hopefully that relationship countries to grow.

Edit:

Actually not just military equipment, found a couple articles on different agreements. Seems they’re pretty solidly choosing China over the US.

Medicine and supplies

https://faso7.com/2025/08/23/burkina-faso-la-chine-fait-un-don-de-45-millions-f-cfa-en-medicaments-et-consommables-medicaux-au-chr-de-koudougou/

Construction Machinery Modernization

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u5elYFSawe8

Weapons and Military Equipment

https://www.zona-militar.com/2025/07/31/china-sigue-fortaleciendo-su-presencia-en-africa-con-la-entrega-de-nuevos-vehiculos-blindados-4x4-mrap-cs-vp14-a-las-fuerzas-armadas-de-mali/

"All the terrorists are dead why are you still here?"
-"because you can't kick me out"

[-] huf@hexbear.net 30 points 7 months ago

In early July, Rudolph Atallah, a security and counterterrorism adviser to Trump, visited Mali to offer the "American solution" for the unrest.

find some other extremists, fund them to take care of these extremists. wait for blowback. rinse and repeat.

[-] Carl@hexbear.net 23 points 7 months ago

I would assume that the Sahel states would all prefer to play both sides and come out on top rather than be married to just one - but the good thing here is that the existence of their military deals with China means that in order for America's deal to even be considered it will have to be a good one. Perhaps they could even take a page out of the Chinese Development book and require that any Western mining firms operating in the country do so through a state-owned mining company on a limited term, letting them get the tech, the expertise, and a larger share of the profits than they would from just selling the rights outright.

But all of this is speculation. It's impossible to know what's going on in Traore and co's heads.

[-] TrippyFocus@lemmy.ml 12 points 7 months ago

Yeah it may be pragmatic to do some kind of deal with the US to gas up trumps ego and reduce the chance of a western backed coup.

Like you said though it would need to be similar to how China went about it with state owned companies.

[-] Euergetes@hexbear.net 21 points 7 months ago

Americans showing up to "help" with your right wing rebel problem? Time to look into who was giving you that rebel problem

[-] carpoftruth@hexbear.net 11 points 7 months ago

hey look it's what all those cancelled USAID programs rebranded and were converted into

[-] miz@hexbear.net 11 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)
[-] whiterose19@hexbear.net 9 points 7 months ago

why are Islamists in Africa always discussed (including by the left) like zombies that just need to be taken out? No one ever asks them what they are fighting about or what their deal is

[-] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 14 points 7 months ago

why would liberals negotiate with the groups they're funding and arming to destabilize a region? they're already getting exactly what they want

from the left i'm not really sure how you expect negotiation with the pawns of empire to ever do anything. Reform and reeducation can't happen when you're precarious, this is adjacent to the comparison between how Puyi and the Romanovs were handled. Do the people being attacked by these groups have the resources to do like Xinjiang?

grievances invented by reactionaries, especially idealist ones, are always illegitimate. If it makes you feel better i think the state should just bomb all those nazi militias too, and they might if those militias actually started serious shit against the state instead of jerking off in the woods and the occasional hate crime the feds tacitly support.

[-] SkingradGuard@hexbear.net 4 points 7 months ago

I don't understand, not all of these groups are fighting for liberation. Usually they're no different from any othet chud religious fascist paramilitary, and are they tend to be fighting against leftists.

[-] graymess@hexbear.net 9 points 7 months ago

Don't do it. Please don't fucking do it.

this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2025
71 points (100.0% liked)

news

24738 readers
689 users here now

Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:

We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.

Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:

The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.

  1. Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

  2. Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.

  3. Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.

  4. Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.

  5. Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.

  6. Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.

  7. American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.

  8. Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.

  9. AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS