6
submitted 1 day ago by GreyShuck@feddit.uk to c/nature@feddit.uk

The government has today (Wednesday 15 July) secured the long-term future of Dartmoor’s iconic pony populations through a package of new protections and financial support.

These heritage rare breeds and semi-wild hill ponies are a much-cherished part of Dartmoor’s landscape and cultural heritage. They also play an important role in conserving protected environmental sites on the moor – and the government is committed to ensuring their numbers do not fall below current levels.

From today, Dartmoor ponies will be removed from stocking rate calculations in new Environmental Management agreements, so that farmers do not face a choice between keeping ponies and maintaining sheep or cattle. This implements recommendation 27 of the 2023 Fursdon Review, an independent review of protected site management on Dartmoor. Pony numbers will also be monitored across the moor to ensure they remain stable.

11
submitted 1 day ago by GreyShuck@feddit.uk to c/nature@feddit.uk

A grey squirrel control co-ordinator in southern Scotland has said their "complete extermination" is the only way to protect red squirrels in the area from a deadly virus.

A number of cases of squirrelpox have been confirmed in the Borders and other parts of the country in recent weeks.

Bill Ferguson of the Central Borders Red Squirrel Network said it meant there was no other option to stop the spread of the disease than "eradication of the grey squirrel".

8
Big Butterfly Count (bigbutterflycount.butterfly-conservation.org)
submitted 1 day ago by GreyShuck@feddit.uk to c/nature@feddit.uk

The Big Butterfly Count is a nationwide citizen science survey aimed at helping us assess the health of our environment. It was launched in 2010 and has rapidly become the world's biggest survey of butterflies.

The Big Butterfly Count 2026 reopens on the 1st of July ready for the main event between the 17th of July and 9th of August. All the counts can be viewed on the interactive map.

We count butterflies because not only are they beautiful creatures to be around but they are also extremely important. They are vital parts of the ecosystem as both pollinators and components of the food chain. However, they are under threat. Numbers of butterflies and moths in the UK have decreased significantly since the 1970s. This is a warning that cannot be ignored.

13
submitted 1 day ago by GreyShuck@feddit.uk to c/nature@feddit.uk

Bottom trawlers drag heavy metal gear and nets that can weigh several tonnes across the seafloor, scooping up almost all life in their path.

This damaging form of fishing has specific severe impacts across the marine ecosystem and is rampant in areas designed to safeguard some of Britain’s most beloved wildlife such as puffins and porpoises, the new Oceana UK report Trawled and Mauled has revealed.

Currently, there are no UK marine protected areas (MPAs) designated for whales, dolphins or porpoises that are fully protected from bottom trawling across the whole site, and only two for seabirds.

64
submitted 1 day ago by GreyShuck@feddit.uk to c/nature@feddit.uk

Wildlife protection frameworks in both the EU and the UK need stronger and more consistent implementation—and must recognize animals as "individuals capable of experiencing suffering," rather than mere ecological assets.

This is the argument from authors of a new peer-reviewed study, which provides the first comprehensive comparative examination of EU and UK wildlife legislation in the post-Brexit era and exposes a disconnect between ambitious policy goals and practical implementation.

The research team, environmental lawyers Dr. Caroline Cox and Dr. Meganne Natali of the University of Portsmouth, reveal significant shortcomings in wildlife protection frameworks across Europe and the United Kingdom, despite decades of legislative development and billions in conservation investment.

16
submitted 2 days ago by GreyShuck@feddit.uk to c/nature@feddit.uk

The UK government has been accused of “rushing through” planning changes that could give developers permission to “trash” nature for as little as £1.

A letter signed by more than 100 conservationists, scientists, celebrities and businesses, including the actor and writer Stephen Fry and the broadcaster Chris Packham, has urged the incoming prime minister, Andy Burnham, to immediately halt the rollout of environmental delivery plans (EDPs).

These plans, which were introduced through the Planning and Infrastructure Act, applying mainly to England and Wales, allow developers to sidestep environmental laws by instead paying into a national nature levy. Campaign groups say this allows developers to pay “cash to trash” wildlife.

44
submitted 2 days ago by GreyShuck@feddit.uk to c/nature@feddit.uk

The nature charity WWF has called for more trees and natural surfaces to be brought into school playgrounds to help regulate soaring temperatures during heatwaves.

Schools are usually surrounded by open spaces, and over recent years these have increasingly been converted into artificial surfaces such as asphalt, astroturf and rubber crumb. These surfaces absorb much more heat than natural ones like grass, soil or sand, which in turn heats the air around the school.

In the record-breaking June heatwave, extreme heat forced hundreds of schools to close and many more to keep children indoors - 63% of primary school teachers, who responded to a recent poll, said they’d been forced to keep children indoors over break or lunch, while 97% said they had made changes to the way they use their outdoor space. Some reported classroom temperatures which exceeded 40 degrees.

6
submitted 2 days ago by GreyShuck@feddit.uk to c/nature@feddit.uk

UK business leaders, senior government officials, scientists and conservation experts are coming together in Edinburgh today (15 July 2026) to take collective action on biodiversity loss – one of the most significant strategic risks facing businesses today.

Hosted by JNCC, the UK Business and Biodiversity Forum (UKBBF) and NatureScot, Biodiversity + Business Live will focus on translating global insight into tangible, strategic action for business and examine how nature-positive leadership can create long-term value and resilience, inform strategic decision-making, enable collaboration at scale, and drive credible business action.

Dr Gemma Harper OBE, Chief Executive of JNCC said: “Nature underpins our economy, our businesses and our communities, yet the evidence is clear that the natural systems we depend on are under increasing pressure. Biodiversity loss is not just an environmental challenge – it is a strategic business risk.

22
submitted 2 days ago by GreyShuck@feddit.uk to c/nature@feddit.uk

“What we used to think of as extreme, we increasingly consider as normal.” That is the summarising comment from Mike Kendon, the Met Office lead author of the latest edition of the State of the UK Climate report.

The report, which covers 2025 puts the latest year and decade into a historical context, tells us about the changes already seen in the UK’s climate.

The key change in the UK’s climate is the ongoing rise in temperatures, with extremes particularly affected.

9
submitted 2 days ago by GreyShuck@feddit.uk to c/nature@feddit.uk

The fight is on to save a rare ecosystem of chalk streams referred to as the Amazon of the UK.

The UK is home to 85% of the world's chalk streams – clear waterways teeming with unique wildlife – but there are concerns about their future, with the usual threats to rivers hanging over them, including pollution.

This year, a bill was introduced in Parliament in a bid to give them protected status with Unesco. It is due to have a second reading in October.

19
submitted 3 days ago by GreyShuck@feddit.uk to c/nature@feddit.uk

There have been more than 50,000 fish killed in Northern Ireland because of water pollution incidents during the past five years.

The kills were caused by 65 separate pollution incidents in rivers and waterways.

Most of the fish kills took place in counties Armagh, Tyrone and Fermanagh and in almost half of the incidents, authorities took no further action.

23
submitted 3 days ago by GreyShuck@feddit.uk to c/nature@feddit.uk

Most of the UK media stories about the record-breaking heatwave that struck in June failed to mention the climate crisis, analysis has found.

Nearly 2,500 articles about the extreme heat – when temperatures topped 37C, a record for the time of year – appeared in the UK’s nine main national daily media publications. But nearly three-quarters of them – about 72% – left out any mention of global heating or the climate, according to the analysis by the Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit (ECIU).

Even fewer pieces drew a link between the heatwave and government policies designed to tackle the climate crisis – less than one in 20 heatwave stories mentioned “net zero”.

[-] GreyShuck@feddit.uk 76 points 2 weeks ago

Is this a cooling behavior, perhaps similar to when dogs pant?

Yes, that is exactly what it is.

[-] GreyShuck@feddit.uk 68 points 2 months ago

Ladybird larva, or ladybug larva, depending on where you are.

[-] GreyShuck@feddit.uk 79 points 2 months ago

I think my equivalent at that age would have been going to a friend's house to watch their newly acquired colour TV instead of our B/W one.

[-] GreyShuck@feddit.uk 107 points 1 year ago

Brush from an electric motor. Looks to be a new-ish one.

[-] GreyShuck@feddit.uk 138 points 2 years ago

Yes, fun idea. No problem with that but... that 'flag' is a sail. They're different things.

[-] GreyShuck@feddit.uk 82 points 2 years ago

I am - in the UK - and I think that it should be opt out rather than opt in.

[-] GreyShuck@feddit.uk 95 points 2 years ago

I manage utility services - among other things - for a group of properties - and have had the mains water analysed for chemical and biological contamination at various times. The results have always been absolutely fine. Not just with EU limits, but far, far, far within them for almost everything and definitely well within them for all measures.

I've got no issues at all with drinking tap water in the UK, even given the state of the rivers etc.

[-] GreyShuck@feddit.uk 424 points 2 years ago

The actual reason that we don't is pretty much because of the invention of sewing machines. Once sewing machines were widespread, making coats became sooo much cheaper than they had been. Coats need a lot of tightly made seams which took time and so made coats very expensive. With sewing machines, making these seams was vastly quicker and more reliable.

Coats win over cloaks in so many ways because you can do things with your arms without exposing them or your torso to the rain and cold: impossible with a cloak.

Capes were the short versions - and intended to cover the shoulder and back without seams that might let the rain in, but with the new machine made seams, they were not needed either.

The really big change was when it became affordable to outfit armies with coats instead of cloaks or capes. At that point all the caché and prestige that was associated with military rank disappeared from cloaks and capes and they were suddenly neither useful not fashionable.

Nowadays, of course, they are no longer what your unfashionable dad would have worn: they are quite old enough to have regained a certain style.

[-] GreyShuck@feddit.uk 75 points 2 years ago

An isolated shingle spit nature reserve. We'd lost mains power in a storm some while back and were running on a generator. Fuel deliveries were hard to arrange. We'd finally got one. We were pretty much running on fumes and another storm was coming in. We really needed this delivery.

To collect the fuel, I had to take the Unimog along a dump track and across 5 miles of loose shingle - including one low causeway stretch through a lagoon that was prone to wash out during storms. We'd rebuilt it a LOT over the years. On the way up, there was plenty of water around there, but it was still solid.

I get up to the top ok and get the tank full - 2000L of red diesel - but the wind is pretty strong by the time I have. Half way back, I drop down off the seawall and reach the causeway section. The water is just about topping over. If I don't go immediately, I won't get through at all and we will be out of fuel for days - maybe weeks. So I put my foot down and get through that section only to find that 200 meters on, another section already has washed out. Oh shit.

I back up a little but sure enough the first section has also washed through now. I now have the vehicle and a full load of fuel marooned on a short section of causeway that is slowly washing out. Oh double shit. Probably more than double. Calling it in on the radio, everyone else agrees and starts preparing for a pollution incident.

In the end I find the firmest spot that I can in that short stretch and leave the Moggie there. Picking my route and my moment carefully I can get off that 'island' on foot - no hope with the truck - BUT due to the layout of the lagoons only to the seaward ridge, where the waves are now crashing over into the lagoon with alarming force. I then spend one of the longest half-hours I can remember freezing cold and drenched, scrambling yard by yard along the back side of that ridge and flattening myself and hoping each time a big wave hits.

The firm bit of causeway survived and there was no washed away Unimog or pollution in the end - and I didn't drown either - but much more by luck than judgement.

These days I am in a position where I am responsible for writing risk assessments and methods statements for procedures like this. It was another world back then.

[-] GreyShuck@feddit.uk 112 points 2 years ago

I experience suboptimal viewing by having to watch ads. If I had to pick one or the other, I know which one I prefer.

[-] GreyShuck@feddit.uk 85 points 2 years ago

Whilst I am sympathetic to the overall aim of this, things like this:

She would have expected people to name figures such as Quintus Lollius Urbicus, who became governor of Roman Britain

...do stand out as being a a bit unrealisitic. I mean, how many governors of Roman Britain of any race or nationality can the typical Briton actually name? I'd be surprised if it was more than 1 and probably less than that.

And if the expectation is that anyone would know of this guy only because his chief contribution to history is "being black" then I am not sure what we are gaining here.

view more: next ›

GreyShuck

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 3 years ago
MODERATOR OF