[-] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 1 points 18 minutes ago

Nurse: Chat what is blud yapping

3
submitted 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) by Flax_vert@feddit.uk to c/unitedkingdom@feddit.uk

The King received an unwanted memento from a visit to a seaside resort where he celebrated the work of local charities – a splattering from a seagull.

Charles joked about his encounter with the bird that left its mark on the bottom of his suit jacket as he toured the Northern Ireland town of Newcastle.

The King was about to start a meet and greet with the public that lined crash barriers along the main street when the bird’s droppings struck, hitting Charles and those around him including the press.

Irene Marting, 64 from the village of Dromara near Lisburn, was waiting in the crowds with her sister Paula Leitch to see the King and witnessed the incident unfold from across the street.

After sharing a joke with Charles about the moment she said: “We were talking to the King about the seagull and he said ‘it’s well it didn’t land on my head’.

“Somebody was trying to get him to put a coat on but he didn’t, being hit by a seagull it’s supposed to be good luck.

“We’re so thrilled he’s come to Northern Ireland to see us and it’s really nice to see him in Newcastle.”

Earlier the King hailed “amazing” foodbank volunteers when he packed boxes of groceries for those in need during his second day in Ulster.

Charles was given the task of filling two boxes with bread, vegetables, tinned goods and toiletries when he met helpers from the Pantry Foodbank based in a church in Newcastle.

He was told by the Pantry’s chairman John O’Neill the items were for one individual and later while looking at boxes destined for a family he made the volunteers laugh when he touched a toilet roll and said “very important”.

[-] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 1 points 2 hours ago

Wasn't Michael Jackson not a kiddy fiddler

[-] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 7 points 4 hours ago

When I was at university, a lecturer was slagging off a marxist society saying that all they did was basically just sit around and argue

[-] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 1 points 4 hours ago

Splatoon was really good at this one

[-] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 6 points 4 hours ago

Once I was in an aviation museum and we were told that we weren't allowed in some of the aircraft cockpits. The reasoning given was because while the aeroplanes are no-longer functional, the same couldn't be said about the ejection seat

[-] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 1 points 6 hours ago

Generally Christians do actually believe in their religion. Christianity doesn't promote "evil shit". It definitely doesn't promote executing people.

[-] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 3 points 16 hours ago

That's not admirable...

[-] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 2 points 17 hours ago

Missed a pun- could have called the bottom-left “美狗人们” 🤣

[-] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 1 points 17 hours ago

I'm talking about the UK. We already have state religion anyway and schools generally have had mandatory religious education and Christian worship during assemblies. We don't have the same constitutional idea of separation of "Church and State" that the USA is supposed to have, moreso a separation of State and Government. So supporting something like this would just be a simple conservative position rather than something radical

[-] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 9 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

There's been times it's created articles based on pure theory and conjecture. It was claiming a while ago that TPUSA was deploying blackshirts in the UK when in reality it was just a bunch of Holiness Christians in trackies having a demonstration in SoHo with no relation or connection to TPUSA

[-] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 1 points 22 hours ago

I'm getting by

[-] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

It concerns me that you're leaving out more detail on what you said.

Revenge is never justified - Romans 12:17-21

Repay no one evil for evil, but give thought to do what is honorable in the sight of all. If possible, so far as it depends on you, live peaceably with all. Beloved, never avenge yourselves, but leave it to the wrath of God, for it is written, “Vengeance is mine, I will repay, says the Lord.” To the contrary, “if your enemy is hungry, feed him; if he is thirsty, give him something to drink; for by so doing you will heap burning coals on his head.” Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good.

However, you're talking about a place in heaven - you don't earn this by good works. It is given you freely by Christ who was treated worse than us and was killed, yet forgives. Christ paid for our sins, including how you may have wronged others, so don't be beating yourself up. Repent and move on. I heavily advise that you seek reconciliation with this person.

Matthew 5:22-25

But I say to you that everyone who is angry with his brother will be liable to judgment; whoever insults his brother will be liable to the council; and whoever says, ‘You fool!’ will be liable to the hell of fire. So if you are offering your gift at the altar and there remember that your brother has something against you, leave your gift there before the altar and go. First be reconciled to your brother, and then come and offer your gift. Come to terms quickly with your accuser while you are going with him to court, lest your accuser hand you over to the judge, and the judge to the guard, and you be put in prison.

Mediation from your Church might be required.

Reconciling with this person is the best outcome. This doesn't just apply to you, it applies to them also.

1 John 1:8-9

If we say we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us. If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.

5
-12
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by Flax_vert@feddit.uk to c/unitedkingdom@feddit.uk
-20
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by Flax_vert@feddit.uk to c/casualuk@feddit.uk
-18
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by Flax_vert@feddit.uk to c/unitedkingdom@feddit.uk

From everyone on Feddit.UK, we congratulate His Majesty the King and Her Majesty the Queen. We look forward to His Majesty making an account on Feddit.UK!

-7
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by Flax_vert@feddit.uk to c/christianity@lemmy.world

Recently I stumbled across this Wikipedia article on Jewish Deicide. It seems to be the doctrine of a collective guilt/charge on what I take to be rabbinic Jews for the death of Jesus.A piece of Scripture that is often used to support it is Matthew 27:25 where the Jewish crucifixion mob at Jesus trial say that the blood of Jesus should be on them and their children.

Other references include the likes of Acts 13:27 and 1 Thessalonians 2:14-15

I have researched it, but it appears Google is filled with either Jewish or Zionist sources complaining about this doctrine and labelling it as antisemetic. On the linked wikipedia article, it even criticises the legitimacy of the New Testament itself as an attempt to attack the idea.

Now, first off, and as a moderator of this community, calling for the harm of Jewish people is not tolerable nor Christian, nor by the rules of this site. Personally, if I were to take this doctrine as true, I would see it as a display/magnification of God's Love and Grace, as Jews are sinners like everyone else and can be forgiven, despite, for the sake of argument, bearing such a charge. Since we are both sinners, made in the image of God, etc, etc, it won't be acceptable at all to try and persecute Jews due to this doctrine.

If this doctrine were true, it doesn't justify the persecution of Jews.

However, as I said, the articles criticising the idea mainly seem to cite the antisemetism that people used this doctrine to justify. I don't think this is correct theological exegesis, as we should be determining our theology from The Bible foremost, with perhaps some Christian writings as well if they lay it out clearly. Essentially, I don't think I can reject this doctrine based on eisegesis.

Also, my mind is not made up on this doctrine, that's why I'm asking here.

I'll say it again, I will punish any displays of hatred towards Jewish people. It has no place in this community. But whether or not they bear the weight of this charge is strictly a theological matter. It doesn't make them any less eligible to God's Grace, who would forgive them even if they were collectively guilty of this (which is powerful). Nor does it invalidate the fact that they are made in the image of God and should be loved and protected like every other human.

I also think there's an aspect that we're all guilty of killing Jesus. So that's also worth throwing in there.

Also, please only really answer this post if you want to have a somewhat productive conversation about this.

6
42
submitted 2 weeks ago by Flax_vert@feddit.uk to c/world@lemmy.world
25
90
submitted 2 weeks ago by Flax_vert@feddit.uk to c/linux@lemmy.ml
332
-5
submitted 3 weeks ago by Flax_vert@feddit.uk to c/justpost@lemmy.world
view more: next ›

Flax_vert

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF