Offsetting the asshole footprint to deceive people is considered a bad action.
Oh nein, warub sollte der Staat auch etwas tun, was nachweislich den Menschen langfristig etwas Gutes tun könnte? Das ist ja fast so wie andere gesundheitlich schädliche Stoffe zu besteuern oder zu verbieten. So wie bei Tabakwaren. Unerhörte Bevormundung durch den Staat! /i
Ironisch, dass der Artikel auf einer Website erscheint, bei der man Tracking zustimmen muss, um den Artikel lesen zu können.
Asshole ratio: 0 % = best person in the world.
100 % = worst person in the world.
Computed as an average of bad "actions" with respect to all actions.
Good and bad evaluated with respect to proven positive impact on people's lifes and the planet.
I noticed it helps a little to use scissors.
Ist der angegebene Schaden denn der Einkaufspreis für Händler oder der Endverbraucherpreis? Falls ersteres, kommen da natürlich noch die anderen Kosten wie Personal, Transport, Lagerung und Profitmarge mit rein.
Tschuldigom
humans, contrary to popular belief, are not monogamous
Please support this statement with proof.
As far as I'm informed this isn't true. Or let's say, such preferences and "imprinted behaviours" are all over the place. Some are monogamous, some are not.
are thus a curse that only serve to hurt us
I don't see how I should be hurt by being with my wonderful spouse for over 10 years. I don't even want anyone else. I wouldn't even be able to build such a strong and deep bond with anyone else. It takes a lot of time and effort to cater it. Even if I wanted to (which I don't), there wouldn't be enough time for anyone else to get to a similar level. So in this case, this is not hurting in any way. To the contrary, it is the optimal constellation for a relationship in my case.
There are plenty of people who are like this and are happy with it. And of course, there are also people who are not. But I don't think either alone is "our nature". We, as humans, are both and have a whole spectrum behind it.
as usual all of this really only benefits rich people
Please elaborate, because I do not see how happy monogamous couples benefit the rich and are therefore a standard that was "forced upon us".
No one forced me. And I began being open for any kind of sexual and romantic preferences, including types of relationships, early on. Never really felt pressured into one or the other. I chose this, voluntarily.
Also, fuck lawns. :)
~~Lemmy~~ Lassmich gut, nix Lases nötig.
UND
shit should just work
The one ancient goal that any OS is trying to achieve and struggles with to this day.
Zacryon
0 post score0 comment score
I disagree. I love cooking with my wife, because we distribute the tasks and I enjoy her company. Those of you, who have issues with stuff like that might need to work on your cooperation skills.