Op een gegeven moment kwam ik erachter dat ik helemaal geen social media gebruik met gepersonaliseerde algoritmes (afgezien van "dit zijn de laatste posts van mensen die je expliciet volgt"). Scheelt echt al enorm om niet in random bubbels geduwd te worden.
It roughly means "someone who takes care [of the new family] in a newborn situation".
In the Netherlands, "kraamverzorgenden" come by the house of new parents every day for ~the first week to show you the ropes, and just in general to help with chores and/or entertaining brothers and/or sisters.
This seems very fair. GNOME developers owe nobody anything of course, so if someone wants to rip out parts/functionality and replace it with someone else, that's both their prerogative and responsibility, but it's friendly and helpful to give advance warning and clear pointers on what to look out for.
Volgens mij zijn er meerdere kabinetten geweest met D66 erin. FWIW, volgens mij is een aantal van de mooie dingen die daar uit voort zijn gekomen ook gewoon het gevolg van het feit dat het de eerste kabinetten waren zonder CDA (of andere religieuze partijen). Dat is mede mogelijk gemaakt door D66, maar ook de andere toenmalige regeringspartijen (VVD en PvdA) waren volgens mij goed warm te maken voor liberale thema's - ze kregen ze er alleen niet doorheen als ze moesten regeren met het CDA, en ook D66 zou dat niet gelukt zijn.
Appears to be a mistake, but needs gorhill to appeal to make the reviewer aware of the mistake and to be able to fix it, which he doesn't feel like doing because he thinks it's unlikely to have been a mistake.
Update: now reversed, but gorhill removed it himself just to not have to deal with the review process and the possibility of human error anymore.
This sounds exactly like the type of nontechnical nonsense they're complaining about: attacking a strawman ("they're trying to prevent people from refactoring C code and making them rewrite everything in the current fancy language") even after explicitly calling out that that was not going to happen ("and to reiterate, no one is trying force anyone else to learn Rust nor prevent refactorings of C code").
They've committed to not changing any displayed text ("strings"), so that translators have time to translate everything.
I'll always upvote StreetComplete.
If TypeScript still is a fad at this point, his definition of fad is far lengthier than mine is.
I'm fairly sure TypeScript will remain in popular use longer than whatever project you're working on 😅
It's a good thing we're no longer this narrow-minded, right? Right?
Vincent
0 post score0 comment score
Well, at least you know how to deal with it gracefully 🙂