[-] [email protected] 6 points 13 hours ago

You can always find outliers. That doesn't mean playing the loto isn't useless.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It's literally what their entire business is based on. Filtering good and bad traffic.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

That's what he's doing here.
Making sure Tesla gets to take advantage of the EV subsidies.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago

This is about paying bills.
Rumps agenda is going to end EV subsidies. Subsidies Tesla could use, maybe even needs. Without them Tesla could be in trouble, and by extension Musk would be.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 4 days ago

Yes! I love it. Been eagerly waiting this one.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago

Now you've done it.
This place will never be the same.
I hope you're happy.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago

There is no one solution. This is an all on the table problem. Everything will contribute. Things should stop being framed as solutions.

A better phrasing would be "whether it'll be a part of the climate solution."

[-] [email protected] 189 points 1 month ago

Do I need to quote the article for people?

Switzerland's current surveillance law instructs mobile networks and internet service providers (ISPs) to collect and store user data. The proposed change would extend this to VPNs, messaging apps, and social media companies.

Yen described it as a "major violation of the right to privacy" – something that directly contradicts Proton's "privacy by default" tagline.

"This revision attempts to implement something that has been deemed illegal in the EU and the United States," Yen claimed. "The only country in Europe with a roughly equivalent law is Russia."

His response seems accurate and reasonable.

147
submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

To my mind, Ban has always meant permanent.
"You're banned from this place! You'll never be allowed in again!"

While I've always thought of Suspend as being temporary.
"You're being suspended from school for 1 week, over fighting."

Ban:

  1. to prohibit especially by legal means
  2. bar entry

Suspend:

  1. to debar temporarily especially from a privilege, office, or function
  2. a: to cause to stop temporarily
    b: to set aside or make temporarily inoperative
  3. to defer to a later time on specified conditions
  4. to hold in an undetermined or undecided state awaiting further information

When I hear someone mention they were banned my reaction is: "Holy shit! WTF did you do to earn that!" Then I find out it was only for a day or three: "Oh... That's not a Ban! That's minor. Go touch grass. You'll be fine."

I've been banned from subreddits and communities a few times. At least once I never even noticed because it was so short.

How is it a Ban if I didn't even notice?

Why did Ban in online forums and games, come to mean temporary?

Is it simply an example of the intensification of language? To make something mundane, seem more severe than it is?

Does it bother anyone else? Or am I alone here?

103
submitted 8 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

I'm genuinely curious about peoples thoughts on this.

It made sense for a while. But the branding change was 16 months ago. The URI change was 3 months ago. Everybody knows now what X is. Yet for some reason, I still see in news stories today:
"... on X — formerly known as Twitter — and said ..."
I really don't think that's needed anymore. But I'm always one to want changes as fast and painless as possible.

So what do you think would be an appropriate amount of time to keep reminding everyone that Twitter is now X?
Months?
Years?
How many?

[-] [email protected] 111 points 8 months ago

No.
The original concept had the first 3 digits identifying a regional office that issued the number.
And no SSN has been issued with any group of digits having all 0's

Fore more info Wikipedia is good at this kind of stuff.

529
submitted 9 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Kagi AI summery:
Cards Against Humanity (CAH) is suing SpaceX for allegedly taking over a plot of land on the US/Mexico border that CAH purchased in 2017 to prevent the construction of Trump's border wall. CAH claims it maintained the land but SpaceX later moved construction equipment and materials onto the property without permission. The lawsuit seeks up to $15 million in damages to restore the land and cover losses, and also requests punitive damages. CAH says SpaceX never asked for permission to use the property and never apologized for the damage. The lawsuit includes before and after photos purporting to show SpaceX's use of the land.

And CAH's website all about it

[-] [email protected] 195 points 11 months ago

How many people did he get sick because he refused to stay home when he should've?

I won't encourage this kind of dedication

[-] [email protected] 111 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I saw a law office once in the early 2000s that was 9-5. And the entire office shut down for an hour, while they all had lunch together in the conference room. The phones all went to voicemail and everything. I was working on replacing a few of their computers that day. They made me stop and join them. Seemed like a great place to work.

[-] [email protected] 148 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Agreed. It really looks like they only killed the one whistle blower.

view more: next ›

Steve

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 2 years ago