this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2024
25 points (100.0% liked)

chat

8137 readers
203 users here now

Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.

As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.

Thank you and happy chatting!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I never watched it, but I've heard about this show both in passing and in "left spaces." Are any of these things true about it? Thanks.

--It is too on the nose with its social commentary. --The criticism it makes is obvious. --The subjects it tackles are low-hanging fruit of the digital era. --It is the stupid person's idea of a profound show. --Something about it being British led to more dunks on it. --The reason it entered left discourse in the first place is because it had potential as a critical text, but ultimately failed at it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago
  1. Sometimes, although there have been some where that’s more in retrospect or became that way because of future events.
  2. Mmm, yeah
  3. Ehh I wouldn’t say that. Maybe as compared to an academic work by a cyberethics expert, sure, but by mass consumption standards it’s good.
  4. The Venn diagram of intelligent people and people who think your intelligence is determined by what show you watch has no overlap.
  5. Not sure. Maybe? I know that “make fun of everything British” meme made the rounds a year or two back so it wouldn’t surprise me.
  6. I think it typically presented capitalism in a negative light, but because it was more about the observation on the dystopia than a solution for it, it couldn’t be truly revolutionary.