this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2024
148 points (93.5% liked)

World News

39004 readers
2731 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Guardian

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I didn't realize the United States government was a dictatorship run by an individual.

Shitty analogy that misses the entire point of what I said to make a point that doesn't apply to the situation.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Well when the individual is sidestepping congress to give more bombs to drop on children and then turning around and wishing to be celebrated for building a port for aid to those children he just helped bomb it sorta feels like maybe he shouldn’t be applauded.

Also im sure this port will only be used for aid and never be used as a navy base of any kind and will never house american military and be used as an excuse to cause more bombings in the region or anything of the sort

[–] [email protected] -2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Literally the same shitty analogy. Even when explained why this style of analogy is bad, yall still try to reduce the government with 2 centuries of history down to the actions of a single man.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It's like your trying to make this more complicated to somehow shift Bidens culpability away. We have three branches of government , the judiciary isn't sending bombs for Isreal to drop on kids, the legislature is too incapable of doing anything at all, so that leaves us with the executive branch that gets to decide whether to send bombs to Isreal and what conditions to put on them. Currently, the executive branch is headed by Joseph R. Biden, and he makes those calls. Just like it was his decision to set up a temporary port for aid. What does 200 years of history have to do with anything? Is George Washington approving arms sales? Did Biden want to condition weapons transfers on Isreal adhering to humanitarian law, but the ghost of Richard Nixon wouldn't let him?

The analogy, in my opinion, works to illustrate the point that just because you did one good thing, that doesn't absolve you of responsibility for the much larger bad thing you are still doing. Biden getting aid in is good, I'm glad and support it and yada yada. But that doesn't mean I'm going to forget that at the same time he is sending bombs (over 50% dropped on Gaza were unguided!) without any conditions on how Isreal uses them.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

It's like your trying to make this more complicated to somehow shift Bidens culpability away.

Yes. I'm the individual who made government a series of bodies and functions more complex than the operations of an individual.

That was me.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

What bodies are relevant here? Congress has famously not approved aid for Isreal, so it's not them. Joseph R. Biden, commander in chief of the armed forces pursuant to Article 2, Section 2 of the US Constitution has unilateral authority to approve, disapprove, or condition arms sales to Isreal. I don't know what you think is constraining him.

Unless you are referring to AIPAC, in which I take your point.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel%E2%80%93United_States_military_relations

You haven't even scratched the topic of military aid provided by the series of bodies of government in the USA who have approved aid for Israel over the course of decades.

I assume you left the majority of funding out because it hurts your point.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2024/02/08/national-security-memorandum-on-safeguards-and-accountability-with-respect-to-transferred-defense-articles-and-defense-services/

I assume you either just don't know what your talking about or are desperate to make this not Joe Bidens fault. But it is. And even if Biden has his hands tied in certain ways, it's not like he's complaining about it. The day of the flour massacre the administration pointedly reaffirmed that they would continue providing aid despite the human rights abuses. But whatever, pretend Biden isn't responsible for sending bombs to Isreal to drop on kids, whatever makes you feel better about yourself.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (2 children)

You are sending taxes to the government to send bombs for Israel to kill kids with.

So ultimately, this is all your fault.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago

Now you're starting to get it. Americans are the bad guys!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Oops! Looks like you you weren't able to find a way to keep shifting blame from Biden. Nice dodge!

I and you and we all do bear some responsibility for the genoicde in Gaza though. Your trying to make a dumb argument, but your actually right. While we, as individual tax payers, do not make decisions on where the money is going, why do have control over who we elect to represent us (to some extent in our two party system).

Which is why I voted non committed in the primary. It's also why I stopped paying federal taxes years ago!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

What? Transitive responsibility for everybody else but you, right?

Childish response. It's fair for you to put these rules of responsibility on everybody else until it's your turn to face the music.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 8 months ago

If you're not moving against the system, you're part of the system.