this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2024
113 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13519 readers
1165 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Thats it. Thats the post.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 18 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I think that's just design convergence. It's not like Ladas and Yugos were statues of Lenin on wheels or anything. Cars look like cars because car is a very good shape for a car.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (4 children)

Its design convergence in response to strict safety & environmental regulations. There aren’t that many designs that will meet all of the constraints. For example, more effort to improve side overlap collisions requires beefier A-pillars.

Though it is changing a bit with the introduction of EVs which don’t need all the transmission and other components running under the floorboards.

Hot take, we might be better off if cars were less safe because people might drive more safely. Kind of like how rugby is safer than American football because they don’t wear helmets and lots of pads.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

the safety improvements in cars for a long time were about protecting you from the other maniacs on the road, not from yourself. i could be convinced that lane assist and things like it cause complacency, but we should have seatbelts and crumple zones

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

this is true much in the same way that designing roads "safer" for cars, e.g. making them wide as fuck with no obstacles, does pretty much the opposite of that and it gets way more dangerous for everybody involved

You want everyone to drive safely? Install a pike on the steering wheel. Guarantee you no one's risking shit anymore

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

we might be better off if cars were less safe because people might drive more safely

We tried that, though, and people did not drive more safely.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

Same with the lack of pads and helmets, you didn't just have CTE, you had people dying every year.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

I've said for a long time we should bring back the steering columns that impale you and replace the airbags with claymore mines. Sure crumple zones save the lives of the occupants but at what cost?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

Seems more likely that American footballers need protective gear because it is more dangerous just as American school children need kevlar backpacks