this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2024
757 points (95.8% liked)

Programmer Humor

19488 readers
291 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 15 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Call me when you found a way to encode transcendental numbers.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Perhaps you can encode them as computation (i.e. a function of arbitrary precision)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Hard to do as those functions are often limits and need infinite function applications. I'm telling you, math.PI is a finite lie!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Do we even have a good way of encoding them in real life without computers?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Just think about them real hard

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

Here you go

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

May I propose a dedicated circuit (analog because you can only ever approximate their value) that stores and returns transcendental/irrational numbers exclusively? We can just assume they're going to be whatever value we need whenever we need them.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Wouldn't noise in the circuit mean it'd only be reliable to certain level of precision, anyway?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

I mean, every irrational number used in computation is reliable to a certain level of precision. Just because the current (heh) methods aren't precise enough doesn't mean they'll never be.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

You can always increase the precision of a computation, analog signals are limited by quantum physics.