100

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

106 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

OP is clearly referring to determinism in a materialist sense and one that leads to a poverty of action.W

Where did I imply this, allow me to quote myself on my previous post.

in recognizing determinism one can resign themselves to the supposed inevitable - that would be stupid, or one could go on living as if they had free will even though it’s probably determined or at least random. Remember that even if it is determined your determined actions still matter. Being convinced whether or not you have free will may be out of your control, but the following actions will still affect the world.

There's my dialectics.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Where did I imply this

The title of this post, the content of this post, and your first response to me.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Sorry for making my meme simplified without a long caveat explaining what I mean exactly philosophically.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Oversimplification is not anyone's complaint here

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

So what is it? This whole argument seems to have started because you didn't like that I used "determinism" positively in the title, as you assumed it implied I thought the universe worked in simple mechanics as Marx's opponents did.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

What is what? I think my criticism is pretty plain and I've had to repeat it many times.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Your position from the first comment is free will and determinism both exist. I have never seen a reason to believe in free will. That is why we are at odds. I don't know if I believe in determinism, but free will as most people use it is incompatible with dialectical materialism.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Your position from the first comment is free will and determinism both exist.

Are you sure about that?

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Dialectical materialism holds that both are at work but that material conditions are dominant.

Am I supposed to take "both" to not include "free will?"

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

You're supposed to review your claim to see whether it's accurate.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

What claim do you want me to review?

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

The one I quoted

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I stand behind my impression that “both” was intended to mean that diamat is ultimately compatiblist. A claim I disagree with, as I am not a compatiblist, yet I see no conflict between that and my dialectical materialist outlook.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Do you really not know what I'm challenging you on?

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

The question is not yet settled by simply debunking religious dogma?

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I guess that's a yes lol

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

This conversation has gone all over the place, I don't know what point you were originally trying to make.

this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2024

100 points (100.0% liked)

memes

23307 readers

461 users here now

dank memes

Rules:

All posts must be memes and follow a general meme setup.
No unedited webcomics.
Someone saying something funny or cringe on twitter/tumblr/reddit/etc. is not a meme. Post that stuff in /c/slop
Va*sh posting is haram and will be removed.
Follow the code of conduct.
Tag OC at the end of your title and we'll probably pin it for a while if we see it.
Recent reposts might be removed.
Tagging OC with the hexbear watermark is praxis.
No anti-natalism memes. See: Eco-fascism Primer

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]