politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
Elections do not end just because there is a war. He's running for re-election and trolling his opposition.
No shit. It was a response to a right-wing American conspiracy about the Superbowl.
This is silly.
Ah, okay.
FYI, while the Super Bowl was taking place, Natanyahu attacked Rafah, where more civilians were killed.
Responding to online people on things that do not matter are more important than what Genocide Joe is funding...
If Biden had not sent that meme, would those people still be alive?
Sorry, how much time and effort do you think it takes for his media team to post a meme?
Genocide Joe has the power to stop funding these wars.
That is why it is being called out, without US support these wars would not be happening at the level they are currently growing towards...
You did not answer my questions. I will ask them again:
I am here to expose what was happening when this meme took place.
Rafah being bombed, that is what I care about, I am sure those questions are important to you, but to me they are a distraction from the OG reason I shared this article.
Thank you for your helpful questions and let us keep on learning of what we are funding!
Either not sending the meme would have stopped the bombing, in which case you should just tell me that is the case or sending the meme would not have stopped the bombing, in which case you posting this article was pointless.
I'm guessing you won't tell me which it is because you're not interested in people asking you questions.
You asked questions and I answered to the best that I could.
It is okay that you do not agree with my view points on this topic.
Why ask questions you know the answer to?
I agian reinstate the reasoning behind my post: to call out the bombing in Rafah during the Super Bowl.
That is a lie. Not only did you not answer, you said you would not answer: "I am sure those questions are important to you, but to me they are a distraction from the OG reason I shared this article."
For the third time:
"If Biden had not sent that meme, would those people still be alive?"
"how much time and effort do you think it takes for his media team to post a meme?"
I think I understand what you are trying to get at by asking these questions, but I am also trying to point out how Genocide Joe is helping Israel.
The meme that was sent out helped continue the talks about Palestinian deaths during the Super Bowl.
Genocide Joe funding Israel has gotten 25,000 to 35,000 civilians killed.
I am pointing out again that Genocide Joe could stop these wars anytime, but choices to continue to fund them.
Really, those deaths were all dependent on Joe Biden? That's pretty wild, because from what I hear his admin has been trying to get Israel to not do a shitload of war crimes, but since we don't actually own Israel as a client state, they can do pretty much what they want to.
Good to know that he personally ordered the killings, and directed the Israeli troops, that everything that happened is all him. It's impressive how well he runs the entire planet for a senile guy, huh?
I knew you wouldn't answer them. Such easy questions to answer too. If you're here in good faith.
That's a lot of posts to avoid answering pretty simple questions.
A) Would those people be alive if Biden's social media team hadn't sent that meme?
B) How much effort do you think Biden, or any of his cabinet who actually make decisions, spent on this? Several seconds approving it if that?
The meme helped keep the talk on Palestine, due to the bombing in Rafah, during the Super Bowl.
Genocide Joe is funding the deaths of civilians, which should be of importance to people that are anti-war.
Yes, I understand that they are simple questions, I am staying on topic about Palestinians deaths happening on Genocide Joe's watch.
You could just write out the more accurate and shorter: "those questions demonstrate the silliness of this post and as such I refuse to answer them!"
By this logic, nobody can do or say anything ever because there are unspeakably terrible things going on at all times, forever. Gaza, while terrible, isn't even the only terrible thing happening. There were terrible things going on before. There will be terrible things to come after.
This isn't intended to minimize the suffering of anyone, but it's impractical to demand that a leader only speak in a tone appropriate to the worst thing currently going on on the planet.
While you were commenting here hundreds of Rohingya refugees died. Why do you endorse the murder of innocent refugees.
... /s obviously that's fucking dumb but it's pretty equivalent to the your point. Lots of things happen contemporaneously, sometimes those things are done to distract from real issues... in this case a staffer saw an opportunity to make conspiracy theorist Republicans look dumb and try to make it less likely that Trump is reelected. I think this meme was, on the whole, good.
What a strange way to tell us that your sense of ideological purity is worth more than people's actual lives.
I see your point but he also didn’t say anything about increasing the minimum wage to help out the millions of Americans living in poverty paycheck to paycheck.
Nor did he discuss offshore tax havens and getting rid of tax loopholes.
Nor did he mention the ongoing war in the Congo.