114
NYT: Russia is helping DPRK to circumvent sanctions.
(www.nytimes.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2024
114 points (96.0% liked)
World News
2650 readers
220 users here now
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
TBF also- the sanctions have no legitimacy on them; US unilateral sanctions are illegal, just another part of the western "rules based order" that flies in direct contradiction of all basic notions of decency and international consensus.
The ones increasingly becoming pariahs, are the west. Which is a good thing- as a Canadian I look forward to the day when all the devil cracker countries (including my own) are held to account for their crimes.
And now, thank goodness, they have voted not to sanction the DPRK.
Russian bourgeoisie badly wanted (and still wants) to be part of the international bourgeoisie. Which shouldn't be any surprise
Well, thankfully now they have their yachts and all their foreign assets and cushy London homes stolen from right under them, and they're being forced to invest in their own country. Now if only Russia could just boot them out altogether...
Issue is, they want those back. So far there's no indication that their partners in class would actually return anything, so dangling promises like carrots on a stick (the way it's been done before) may not work. At least, not for some time.
As for investing.. I don't think they will, not really. They will intensify the extraction of wealth from the populace, sure, but invest? Nah. If you could pick between building a mansion on Lake Cuomo in Italy, or building a mansion in Moscow Oblast (with similar prices for land, mind you) - you'll pick Italy every time. The climate is nicer, there's stuff indulge in, and they could pretend not to be part of the people they are robbing.
You know, just like their predecessors did in the empire days.
They're not being given much of a choice to my understanding- between the west blatantly stealing their assets wherever they find them, and their diminishing in influence allowing Putin and the Russian state to strongly "incentivize" the matter and finally reel them in.
The dynamic is less what you describe now, and more "they can choose Russia and their Russian assets- and play by tightening Russian rules- or they can choose to flee to their vacation homes in the west, and have to cut ties in the homeland for the west to allow them to do so." A very happy dynamic indeed (for everyone who's not the oligarchs)