this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2024
249 points (88.8% liked)

Not The Onion

12272 readers
1665 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://mbin.grits.dev/m/mews/t/22301

White House calls for legislation to stop Taylor Swift AI fakes

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I'm aware it's already legal, hence why action should be taken. plus videos are just a bunch of photos stitched together so I don't see your point of it only applying to photos.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Because it being nude/etc is the only thing that is different from people just simply drawing others in art.

Just because you don't like pornography, shouldn't change the legality of it. It's prudism and puritanism at its finest.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

it's not porn in general that should be illegal. ONLY pornography where the person has not explicitly said they would like to be in it. such as deepfake porn, or drawn where the person has also not said they would like to be in it.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

If I draw a nude stick figure with two perfect circle tits and say its Taylor Swift, would I have broken the law?