Main
THE MAIN RULE: ALL TEXT POSTS MUST CONTAIN "MAIN" OR BE ENTIRELY IMAGES (INLINE OR EMOJI)
(Temporary moratorium on main rule to encourage more posting on main. We reserve the right to arbitrarily enforce it whenever we wish and the right to strike this line and enforce mainposting with zero notification to the users because its funny)
A hexbear.net commainity. Main sure to subscribe to other communities as well. Your feed will become the Lion's Main!
Good comrades mainly sort posts by hot and comments by new!
State-by-state guide on maintaining firearm ownership
Domain guide on mutual aid and foodbank resources
Tips for looking at financials of non-profits (How to donate amainly)
Community-sourced megapost on the main media sources to radicalize libs and chuds with
Main Source for Feminism for Babies
Maintaining OpSec / Data Spring Cleaning guide
Remain up to date on what time is it in Moscow
view the rest of the comments
This person is asking this question for the wrong reason, they obviously just want to feed their white aggrievement. If they actually care about the question they'd do a little research and realize women and minority candidates do much better against the Democratic machine because Corporate Dems will quickly label a white man as racist for running against a minority or sexist for running against a woman. Can't do that against a minority or woman.
The smearing of Corbyn as anti-semite is the playbook. Corporate Democrat ideology only allows for representation in elite circles - a black president, a woman general, a trans police chief is the most progressive thing a Corporate Democrat can accomplish. Their ideology does not allow for class politics. We may see their weaponization of identity as callous, but it's the only belief they have.
If Corporate Democrats didn't own the entirety of the party, then we'd probably see more white males running and winning. But Brand New Congress and Justice Dems realize what they're up against.