you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (46 children)
  • [–] -4 points 2 years ago (23 children)

    Simple. If you're hiring based on diversity, you aren't hiring based on merit. The two are incompatible. And I, for one, would rather fly an airline where merit decides the pilot, not race

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 23 child comments
  • [+] 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (22 children)
  • [–] -2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Peepin my dude, that is not what he said. He said that you can't select for both. That doesn't strictly mean that a qualified queer black woman doesn't exist, it means that you can't hire for diversity and for merit at the same time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)
  • [–] -3 points 2 years ago

    as if the two were mutually exclusive

    Because they are. If you're prioritizing one metric of judgement, you're inherently putting at least some metrics below it. And unless you're of the stance that there's a big stack of 100% identical in every way other than diversity qualities, those people are all going to have different levels of actually relevant qualifications.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -2 points 2 years ago (16 children)
  • [+] 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (15 children)
  • [–] -4 points 2 years ago (14 children)

    If you're making selections based on diversity, you're fundamentally not focusing on hiring the best of the best. And for safety critical positions like pilots, I would much rather have the focus be 100% on quality.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [+] 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (13 children)
  • [–] -3 points 2 years ago (12 children)

    The best is the best, regardless of whatever bs diversity qualities. You'll get them without having to specifically look for shit like race and sex. Looking for those instead means you're no longer looking for the best, you're looking for whoever meets minimum standards and is also an acceptable race

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [+] 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (11 children)
  • [–] -2 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    Because the moment you're preferring race, you're fundamentally not preferring something else, and if you ask me, race is pretty much the absolute bottom of the list of things to judge people on.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children)
  • [+] -6 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    But what is not being excluded is whether any given person is the best of the best by our assumption.

    I mean if you want to work from a false premise, there's no point in further having this discussion

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)
  • [+] -6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I literally asked you to correct me.

    I did. Multiple fucking times. But it didn't fit whatever stupid strawman you wanted, so you just ignored it and acted stupid. Or more realistically, it wasn't an act

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] [S] -6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (14 children)
  • [+] 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (13 children)
  • [+] [S] -4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (12 children)
  • [+] 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (11 children)
  • [+] [S] -5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (10 children)
  • [+] 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (9 children)
  • [+] [S] -4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (8 children)
  • [+] 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (7 children)
  • [+] [S] -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (6 children)
  • [+] 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children)
  • [+] [S] -2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)
  • [+] 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)
  • [+] -6 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    If you are picking candidates based on something besides qualifications, you will be picking less qualified candidates.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children)
  • [–] -1 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    The kid's goal for picking at dodgeball is not solely to have the best team, it's to have fun too. If they picked for the best team they'd pick differently. It's not racism or misogyny to want the most qualified candidate when safety and lives are involved.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)
  • [+] [S] -4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)
  • [–] -1 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    You have a pool of candidates if they are ranked based on qualifications the order is not guaranteed to be the same as if you prioritize diversity. If you want the most qualified candidates the only way you can guarantee it if you only focus on qualifications.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment