this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2024
138 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13446 readers
693 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Really??? Im trying to understand and you're not being persuasive. Saying you dont care about someone losing their income just comes off as cruel.

Should we regulate it so that only McDonald's afford to run a restaurant? Should benefits be based on employment?

You're acting like under our system this is a benevolent outcome and there couldn't be a downside.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago

The downside: Small business owners can no longer force employees to work for poverty wages

The upside: the poorest workers in California get a living wage

Why should we care about a few small business owners who can't afford to not exploit their employees? And why should they be prioritized over the workers?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

the business owner can get a job just like his workers. ensuring a capitalist can remain a capitalist is not high on my list of priorities.