chapotraphouse

13446 readers

693 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

138

Petty tyrant wants you to know he will be "forced" to unleash pain on workers. (hexbear.net)

submitted 8 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

81 comments fedilink hide all child comments

https://www.businessinsider.com/fast-food-operator-kills-vacations-hikes-prices-calif-wage-law-2024-1

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Well, no, it’s a factor but. LTV and all that. Which still doesn’t mean higher wages means higher prices, I think.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

LTV isn't about price.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

yeah no i guess i didn't think it did, was sort of worried you were taking the supply/demand narrative at face value but i'm dumb

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Marx on the relationship between wages and prices

As we suppose that no change whatever has taken place either in the productive powers of labour, or in the amount of capital and labour employed, or in the value of the money wherein the values of products are estimated, but only a change in the rate of wages, how could that rise of wages affect the prices of commodities? Only by affecting the actual proportion between the demand for, and the supply of these commodities.

https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1865/value-price-profit/

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

Makes sense