this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2024
891 points (96.2% liked)

solarpunk memes

2597 readers
375 users here now

For when you need a laugh!

The definition of a "meme" here is intentionally pretty loose. Images, screenshots, and the like are welcome!

But, keep it lighthearted and/or within our server's ideals.

Posts and comments that are hateful, trolling, inciting, and/or overly negative will be removed at the moderators' discretion.

Please follow all slrpnk.net rules and community guidelines

Have fun!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Correct me if I'm wrong, but they didn't say they wanted less state. Just for the state to do less bad things/things that hinder its citizens. That doesn't mean they must oppose school lunches, unless they also believe that school lunches fit into that category. You can argue whether or not they do, but 'you don't want the government to hinder us, but X is the government hindering us, therefore you must oppose X' isn't much of an argument on its own.

Apologies if I misunderstood your comment tho.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

no they want less state because the ideology dictates that the state just does it worse, something that just isn't born out by reality, case and point school lunches

[–] [email protected] -1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I'm for small government so yes, I want less state. But school lunches is definitely one of the last things that should be cut. Since I'm fairly certain that in real world we're never going to cut or fix the hundreds of things that are more wrong than publically funded school lunches, in practical terms I'm not advocating against them.

That said, just because school lunch is publically funded aka "free" does not necessarily make it good. https://www.edweek.org/leadership/healthier-school-lunches-may-have-curbed-childhood-obesity-new-study-finds/2023/06 -- but again, that's a detail problem that can be fixed (like it was here) without dropping that practice altogether.

And as for the other items in zargotext's list, I pretty much agree with them too. But also excessive regulation, market distortions of every kind, poor educational systems, bureacracy.

If the context is USA, it's an old country in modern terms. A lot of cruft has accumulated in 300 years and it's not getting better. Ditto for many others.