this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2024
69 points (100.0% liked)

World News

39000 readers
2335 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Yemen's Houthi rebels fired an anti-ship cruise missile toward an American destroyer in the Red Sea on Sunday, but a US fighter jet shot it down in the latest attack roiling global shipping amid Israel's war with Hamas in the Gaza Strip, officials said.

The attack marks the first US-acknowledged fire by the Houthis since America and allied nations began strikes Friday on the rebels following weeks of assaults on shipping in the Red Sea.

The Houthis have targeted that crucial corridor linking Asian and Mideast energy and cargo shipments to the Suez Canal onward to Europe over the Israel-Hamas war, attacks that threaten to widen that conflict into a regional conflagration.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 28 points 10 months ago (3 children)

I'm getting "suicide by cop" vibes from these guys. What do they hope to achieve other than getting wrecked when they've pissed the US off enough?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 10 months ago (2 children)

They probably want the same thing the Taliban got: their own country where they can terrorize the local population without any real repercussions.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago

That's what the Taliban had before

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

Problem is nobody needs to move through Afghanistan.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago

Martyrdom, probably

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Their clearly in it for the 72 virgins... Or 72 fruits, depending on the translation they subscribe to

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This is being reported as "Islamophobia", but while OPs language does trivialize the issue, it's a SURPRISINGLY deep topic. There's a good article here:

https://www.theguardian.com/books/2002/jan/12/books.guardianreview5

The tl;dr is if you translate that part of the Qur'an assuming the source language is Arabic, you get your "72 virgins" or possibly "72 angels".

On the other hand, if you translate it assuming Syriac instead of Arabic, it comes out "white raisins" of "crystal clarity".

This is one of the many difficulties in translating the Qur'an. It has multiple, layered meanings that are difficult to relay accurately in English.

So I'm going to leave this comment alone, it's an un-necessary trivialization of a serious topic, but not necessarily Islamophobia.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 10 months ago

Oh come on, what's even Islamophobic about this? I could have made a joke like this about any other religion without being something phobic