this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2024
202 points (100.0% liked)

askchapo

22752 readers
324 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try [email protected] if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

To all full-grown hexbears, NO DUNKING IN MY THREAD...ONLY TEACH, criminal scum who violate my Soviet will be banned three days and called a doo doo head...you have been warned

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 50 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Keep in mind that the DPRK had 20% of its people killed off in a matter of 3 years and much of its land destroyed.

So, while there have been a famine in recent memory (during the 1990s), this has been a result of the economic embargo and sanctions on the country.

I'm trying to be as honest as I can with you here.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Yeah that’s wild, i just listened to the Blowback podcast and during the korean war the US military ran out of north korean targets to bomb.

People keep referencing that north korea is a hermit kingdom and that it actively does not want to participate in the global economy and … that makes sense? I too would be paranoid and disinclined to negotiate with the outside world after having the outside world literally burn me into rubble.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Keep in mind that North Korea, or the DPRK, can't really trade except for with countries like China and the Russian Federation (and even then illegally while those two countries look the other way).

It's literally in an embargo that's been going on for decades now.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 9 months ago (5 children)

That too. Although, I wonder what the terms of the embargos are, and what north korea has to do on their side to appease the west and allow trade.

Oh why is this country so corrupt and backwards! Let’s put more sanctions in to restrict its trade and starve its citizens.

Western logic 😵‍💫

[–] [email protected] 39 points 9 months ago (1 children)

what north korea has to do on their side to appease the west and allow trade

Cuba tried to ask for such terms and was told no terms would be offered.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 9 months ago

Per Blowback, Che offered to the US, in exchange for lifting the blockade:

  • No exporting Revolution

  • No military alliance with the USSR

  • Cuba wouldn’t / couldn’t directly pay back the US for appropriated property, but were willing to reimburse the US over time through terms of trade

Really, the only non-negotiable was that Cuba was a communist country, and would have communist governance and a communist economy. JFK thought it was a sign of weakness on Cuba’s part and turned them down.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 9 months ago

Yeah, there are virtually no terms (from what I've read), as the country's leadership is seen as undemocratic and dictatorial and, therefore, the United States and its allies dictate the terms (and DPRK has to follow them) while North Korea doesn't get a say. It is called a rogue state partly for that reason (as opposed to a country like Saudi Arabia, which has often been a staunch partner of the United States).

But we know that it has a functioning democracy at various levels; certainly no worse than most Western democracies.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 9 months ago

That too. Although, I wonder what the terms of the embargos are, and what north korea has to do on their side to appease the west and allow trade.

Most of the recent-ish embargoes (last few decades) are most directly the US and friends punishing the DPRK's development of nuclear weaponry. This is plainly because the nuclear arms are one of the DPRK's strongest deterrents to US invasion, since it's not as though the DPRK wants to use those weapons or intends to except under the circumstances of being invaded by foreign powers.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

If you're interested in what the UN sanctions resulting from their nuclear program are, they're here and they are very very broad.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago

They used to trade with other countries. They were unique in the communist world for how much they traded with capitalist countries. It's why they outperformed south Korea for so long. The embargo against them crashed their economy (along with the collapse of the USSR) which led to the crisis of the 90s until now