this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2023
139 points (94.3% liked)

Ask Lemmy

27006 readers
1452 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try [email protected]


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected]. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Similar to the recent question about artists where you can successfully separate them from their art. Are there any artists who did something so horrible, so despicable, that it has instantly invalidated all art that they have had any part in?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

NGL If I were rich Id probably buy one of his paintings just to hang it in the least used guest barhroom.

Id never mention that it was a "Hitler" or why I had it. Id just like to have his failure be something my least favorite relatives have to stare at while they take a shit. My own personal fuck you to the cunt.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago

I don't like it. It's smug aura mocks me. It's evil, Charlie!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That's really inviting layers of ugliness into your life and your mind, and subjecting your guests to stealth ugliness.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Nope, its hilarious.

Reducing anything that anyone who venerates Hitler or Nazis to a joke is better than destroying it. Because its just a shitty painting, its not evil, it doesnt hold psychic power, its not a banner to rally behind. Its just a terrible mans terrible painting that is now something that hangs above Uncle Joe while he clogs the toilet with his mammoth fast food dumps.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago

It's poison, and you'd be subjecting yourself and your guests to poison.

It's not funny, and Burt K is a drooling moron. He's pretty much brain dead.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Hitler actually made some pretty good art.

But even way back then, the art world was a crock of shit.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago (2 children)

His art was okay, but it's only famous because of some of the other stuff he did.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 11 months ago

Plot twist: that was his goal all along. /j

[–] [email protected] -2 points 11 months ago

Plot twist: that was his goal all along. /j