86
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 76 points 2 years ago

Again threatening us with a good time, but unfortunately this is probably worth as much as the pile of manure western think tanks were feeding the world in Ukraine topic before.

So i read it and yup, the exact same manure and it's still sprinkled with copium

It would give China the green light to flex its power over a weakened US and cost US taxpayers an "astronomical" sum to pay for beefed-up defense spending.

"Such an outcome would bring a battered but triumphant Russian army right up to NATO's border from the Black Sea to the Arctic Ocean,"

That would mean that the US would be forced to deploy a "sizable portion" of its ground forces to Eastern Europe

Literally every paragraph is crybullying and saberratling. They really get paid heavy money for that regurgitated nonsense?

[-] [email protected] 63 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

expand NATO to meet Russia's borders

cry that the russian army is right up to NATO's border

???

[-] [email protected] 32 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Just like when they cried that the USSR put nukes in Cuba after the US already put nukes in Turkey, and a shit load of other countries right next to the USSR. But it's the Russians that are aggressive and militaristic.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

Thank you to my high school modern history teacher who was also the football coach for telling my about the Turkey nukes during the unit on the cold war, and also for showing us how to flick a coin like a tiny frisbee

[-] [email protected] 31 points 2 years ago

It's fine when we do it but not when they do it.

Western brain in action.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago

I’ve definitely known people like this

[-] [email protected] 61 points 2 years ago

What I love the most about these articles is how they just treat the idea that US needs to dominate the world militarily as being axiomatic. It's never explained why this is in the interest of American people, it's just a given that US will have to keep expanding the military at the cost of the standard of living of its people because reasons.

[-] [email protected] 41 points 2 years ago

Imperialism is non-negotiable.

[-] [email protected] 38 points 2 years ago

It's simple, if the US stopped, the empire would fall, and then the evil China takes over. Silly tankie.

[-] [email protected] -5 points 2 years ago

I’ve experienced some violence in my life, and I consider the fact that I need to be ready to protect myself to be axiomatic too. I honestly can’t remember why I didn’t think that way before, but I know that ever since being terrified as someone tried to kill me, nothing is okay unless I’m safe. The fact that I need to maintain the capacity for violence and the capacity to win that violence is just built into me now. Like needing to breathe.

[-] [email protected] 19 points 2 years ago

Except, the difference with your analogy is that US is not a victim of violence, it's the country that goes around the world to invade and brutalize other countries. It's a country equivalent of a sadistic serial killer.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

There is no universe in which the US is the victim

[-] [email protected] 48 points 2 years ago

It would give China the green light to flex its power over a weakened US and cost US taxpayers an "astronomical" sum to pay for beefed-up defense spending.

So the excessive military spending by the US empire is China's fault somehow.

[-] [email protected] 19 points 2 years ago

Damn those scheming asiatics, DAMN THEM ALL TO HELL!!!

[-] [email protected] 40 points 2 years ago

“Such an outcome would bring a battered but triumphant Russian army right up to NATO’s border from the Black Sea to the Arctic Ocean,”

Wasn't that exactly what they promised Ukraine lol?

[-] [email protected] 38 points 2 years ago

“Such an outcome would bring a battered but triumphant Russian army right up to NATO’s border from the Black Sea to the Arctic Ocean,”

I wonder if not expanding the de facto NATO-Russia border might have prevented the expansion of the NATO-Russia border 🤔

[-] [email protected] -1 points 2 years ago

It’s not that complex. Yeah we can fight. No, it wouldn’t be good for us if we do.

this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2023
86 points (94.8% liked)

Death to NATO

1651 readers
34 users here now

For posting news about NATO's wars in Ukraine, Serbia, Kosovo, and The Middle East, including anywhere else NATO is currently engaged in hostile actions. As well as anything that relates to it.

Rules:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS