I don't really see how this is a valid complaint
It's discrimination based on race, it's literal racism
I don't really see how this is a valid complaint
It's discrimination based on race, it's literal racism
Are they stealing tactics from looney tunes?
Anyone can break up a showing of an enemy propaganda tllm by putting two or three dozen large moths in a paper bag. Take the bag to the movies with you, put it on the floor in an empty section of the theater as you go in and leave it open. The moths will fly out and climb into the projector beam, so that the film will be obscured by fluttering shadows.
Is there a write up or discussion about this?Didn't notice it, but I don't visit hexbear a lot
edit: nvm, saw the other post on /c/comradeship and followed the links. what a mess
It's too soon since I last played it, so no, sorry
Can you play with your friends?
Yes
It's even worse when you realize they're not hurting the Rep voter, but his family members who could very well vote Dem, if they could.
73% upvoted
I expected too much from reddit, I suppose. I believe (and hope that it's the case) that it's some guy seething from upvotes and won't actually go through with this.
Anonymous is still a thing?
"We have a majority to extend the eviction moratorium, but not enough people showed up to votes!"
Chat is this real
Do you remember where you read that? Sounds interesting
Turns out the paperclip AI is the good outcome
Our freedom fighters vs their terrorists
English is not my native language, but I think there's a valid distinction between systemic (an institution being racist) and non-systemic racism (an individual or individual entity being racist)
If this was an American company doing this in another country, wouldn't we be calling this racist? I understand that there can be no systemic violence against white people in the US, but there can be discrimination (as you call it) against them. Also, like another commenter mentioned, what if other people (e.g black people) were discriminated against with this policy? Would you then call it racist instead of "just" discriminatory?
It doesn't seem a meaningful distinction to make in this case, at least to me.