You probably haven't heard of the battle pitting BCTGM Union Local 390G against International Flavors (IFF) in Memphis, TN, USA. But with workers who are mega-exploited and a company that refuses to stand down, it has become one of the most relevant for the working class.
What is IFF and what do these workers do?
You probably haven't even heard of the company, IFF. But IFF is a key company that has a yearly revenue of multiple billions of dollars and is ranked as one of the biggest in America. In this case, the involved workers produce a type of soy protein that's an essential component of many food products.
And it's dangerous work. "Because the stuff in there, it only takes a split second for something to go wrong and you’ll be missing a foot, a toe, a head", a worker stated in a report by More Perfect Union. "And if you don't know what you're doing, you'll get hurt [...] or lose your life".
What conditions do the involved workers face? To briefly name a few of the issues:
- Often required to work 12 hours in a day
- No overtime pay for 12 hour days
- Decrease in (or company attempt to decrease) real wages, healthcare benefits, paid breaks, retirement
"They don't want us to get the crumbs that fall on the ground", said the same IFF worker, among this heavily black workforce. "We're going back to slavery times."
What has been the response of the company so far?
The workers have hit a brick wall when it comes to expecting anything from this company. That's why the strike has lasted so long -- it refuses to give in to their demands. The company hopes to exhaust the workers, who aren't being paid any wages. It's banking on poverty and a bad quality of life forcing them to return to work and accept horrible conditions.
Why is this strike so important?
The IFF strike has barely got any press coverage, and it may not involve a very large worker count like some more well-known strikes. But many of these strikes involve workers who already have some extremely basic guarantees -- like a maximum 8 hours of work in a day.
In the case of the IFF workers, they lack even that. They're facing extreme exploitation of the kind that has grown increasingly common in the USA, a country where the 8 hour day keeps getting more historically distant -- which has been met with little resistance so far. This strike represents the beginning to that resistance.
And so this strike is a key front in the battle of whether companies will succeed imposing these extreme conditions. If the workers win, it will represent a blow to their ability to do so and set back their plans. But if this battle fails, things may end up much worse for everyone.
How can people help the workers win this strike?
- Donate to the strike fund so that the workers can keep the strike up for longer and force this company to stand down.
- Publicize this strike as much as possible.
Wrong, I'm a truck driver and therefore exempt.
I work in the office 99% of the time.... but once or twice a month I do have to drive.
Oh what a lovely country I live in.
https://www.dol.gov/agencies/whd/fact-sheets/19-flsa-motor-carrier
Log book rules are a tiny complicated for most to understand.
However, FLSA ISN'T that complicated. If you don't cross state lines, if you're not driving a truck that weighs at least 10,000+ Pounds all the time then you're likely intitled to OT. The Motor Carrier Exemption isn't really for every office joe that happens to have a DOT medical because they sometimes move a box truck.
Yeah but I am driving a 53' semi and could reasonably be asked to go across state lines so I would still be exempt.
(generally us office staff would only cover shorter stuff if a driver calls out and nobody else can cover but it could reasonably happen)
The last time I looked into the salary exempt restrictions it had to be your primary job for the exemption to apply, if you are averaging most of your work time not doing exempt things you should file a complaint, worst case scenario is they say 'yea tough shit it's exempt'
Seems pretty clear cut unfortunately. "Employees performing such duties meet the duties requirement of the exemption regardless of the proportion of “safety affecting activities” performed"