you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 67 points 2 years ago (12 children)

That Nokia was never a shitbox though. That was an excellent product when it launched and you’ll have a hard time finding owners who disliked it. Heck, you’re liable to get an earful for disparaging it, and rightfully ao.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    Absolutely, I would also argue the same for the Hilux

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Really wish they sold the Hilux in the USA

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

    I prefer the slightly newer 3410. It has a better button layout and added features such as web browser, picture editor and downloadable games (my grandma somehow has the long-lost first ever 3D Java game Munkiki's Castles on hers, which has been in daily use for 20 years). However, they are so similar that their later revisions only differed by the button placement and firmware (see Janus Cycle's video).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Yowza, that man certainly violated that 3310 in ways it's going to remember. That's a neat piece of hardware for sure.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Funny how he flashed the firmware and struggled with the incompatible button layout rather than getting a cheap second-hand 3410, even a broken one would do (are there any broken ones, though?)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    you’ll have a hard time finding owners who disliked it

    Well hello there. It's been more than 20 years, but I remember the keyboard on that thing being complete garbage. It was mushy, yet knee-dialing all the time with no automatic locking. And keyboard lock was some stupid unwieldy two-hand combination. The UI was extremely clunky too with only one button and two arrows pointing who knows where, and those arrows keys tended to get sticky over time. Also it was overly heavy and bulky, with a terribly attached back cover giving it a false sense of robustness - it shattered in pieces just like any other phone of that era. I think it was rather power hungry, too, I'm not sure, but I definitely did change the battery a couple of times. Overall, though, not a terrible phone by any means, but it was neither the most advanced nor the cheapest option, just the most widely marketed one right around the time when mobile phones started booming and ended up as a lot of people's first one.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    See, I had one as well. I always had proper belt cases on my phones, so I never experienced any butt dialling or back cover issues. The keyboard lock was annoying for sure.

    I always loved the weight and size of that phone generation. I’ve got giant hands and later phones just felt too small to comfortably use. Heck, I’d buy one of those giant brick phones if they sold a decent one. Give me that two week battery life!

  • source
  • parent