this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2023
594 points (86.6% liked)

politics

19072 readers
3739 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No it doesn't. It just takes putting your political toadies in the seats. They just say whatever the fuck they want to say. It's not an institution that means anything. Not any further than 'they get to say whatever the fuck they want' that is. Have you read their decisions? They're barely even trying to pretend anymore. Why are you?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's the 3rd equal part of government as defined by the US Constitution, so yes, it IS an institution just as much as the Legislative and Executive branches.

You can't ignore a constitutionally mandated part of our government just because you don't agree with them.

Now, it CAN change. We saw it change on abortion rights, all it takes is a concerted effort to appoint judges who feel the way you do over a 50 year period of time.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think you're being very present in our conversation. You're not following very well.

When did I say it wasn't an institution? When did I say it wasn't a branch of government?

all it takes is a concerted effort to appoint judges who feel the way you do over a 50 year period of time.

Oh there are much easier and faster ways to deal with them. Like for instance just ignoring them.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

When did I say it wasn't an institution?

2 Comments above:

"It's not some sacred institution that should be respected."

1Comment above:
"It's not an institution that means anything."

When did I say it wasn't a branch of government?

That's implied when you say "just ignore them."

You do NOT have the option of ignoring a branch of government defined by the Constitution.

Anymore than you can choose to ignore the Executive or Legislative branches.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

sacred, should be respected

that means anything

That’s implied when you say “just ignore them.”

No it isn't

You do NOT have the option of ignoring a branch of government defined by the Constitution.

Yes you do. It's been done before.

Anymore than you can choose to ignore the Executive or Legislative branches.

Yes fuck those branches as well but this is off topic

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wow, so you essentially have absolutely no idea how our system of government works.

Good luck with "just ignore it" if you ever end up in court, I guarantee that will not go well for you.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You should crack a history book before you start spouting off about how other people don't know things. When someone tells you something has been done in the past, it's kinda dumb to just spout off "that's not how that works!" with such a smug, sophomoric attitude.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Cite your sources then if you're so confident. Show me when someone has told the Supreme Court to piss off and gotten away with it.

You don't get to just say "yeah they have" and just drop it.

They are the SUPREME court. There is no higher authority in US law.

See:

https://www.democracydocket.com/news-alerts/after-unprecedented-defiance-alabama-has-a-fair-congressional-map-for-2024/

Which is on track to repeat itself here:

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/elections/louisiana-legislators-jan-15-enact-new-congressional-map-court-says-rcna124726

Telling the Supreme Court "No, I don't think I will" is not an option.