627
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

It was not water resistant, actually. I'd know. Mine was broken when I got pushed into a swimming pool. :(

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

It was, even had a cover for the USB port. I took a few baths with it (really dumb idea now that I think about it)

[-] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago

Lol you're thinking of the S5

Honestly, though. The S5 has a user-replaceable battery, IP67 water/dust resistance, USB 3.0, a fingerprint reader, a headphone jack, an AMOLED display, expandable storage, awesome cameras...It was absolutely peak Samsung and the phone's only major flaw is the Micro Type B port.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

Well, allow me to express my apologies then, I was wrong

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

It's all good, dude.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

You mean the micro USB 3.0 v1 which was backwards compatible with micro usb. That's right you could use the new fangled USB 3.0 port and cable and get those speeds as well as charging rate. Or....... Use a bog generic USB micro USB 2.0 cable and it would still fit on one side of the port and was still useable for USB 2.0 speeds and charging rates.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

But I concede that it is one of the worst and most delicate ports ever stuck on something expected to have a plug jammed in it literally a thousand times.

this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2023
627 points (100.0% liked)

196

17843 readers
245 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS