196

16450 readers

1711 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

626

We interrupt your programming rule (slrpnk.net)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

77 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It was not water resistant, actually. I'd know. Mine was broken when I got pushed into a swimming pool. :(

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It was, even had a cover for the USB port. I took a few baths with it (really dumb idea now that I think about it)

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Lol you're thinking of the S5

Honestly, though. The S5 has a user-replaceable battery, IP67 water/dust resistance, USB 3.0, a fingerprint reader, a headphone jack, an AMOLED display, expandable storage, awesome cameras...It was absolutely peak Samsung and the phone's only major flaw is the Micro Type B port.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, allow me to express my apologies then, I was wrong

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

It's all good, dude.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You mean the micro USB 3.0 v1 which was backwards compatible with micro usb. That's right you could use the new fangled USB 3.0 port and cable and get those speeds as well as charging rate. Or....... Use a bog generic USB micro USB 2.0 cable and it would still fit on one side of the port and was still useable for USB 2.0 speeds and charging rates.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

But I concede that it is one of the worst and most delicate ports ever stuck on something expected to have a plug jammed in it literally a thousand times.