114
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

During the 1973 Arab–Israeli War, Arab members of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) imposed an embargo against the United States in retaliation for the U.S. decision to re-supply the Israeli military and to gain leverage in the post-war peace negotiations. Arab OPEC members also extended the embargo to other countries that supported Israel including the Netherlands, Portugal, and South Africa. The embargo both banned petroleum exports to the targeted nations and introduced cuts in oil production. Several years of negotiations between oil-producing nations and oil companies had already destabilized a decades-old pricing system, which exacerbated the embargo’s effects.

Effects

The effects of the embargo were immediate. OPEC forced oil companies to increase payments drastically. The price of oil quadrupled by 1974 from US$3 to nearly US$12 per 42 gallon barrel ($75 per cubic meter), equivalent in 2018 dollars to a price rise from $17 to $61 per barrel.

The crisis eased when the embargo was lifted in March 1974 after negotiations at the Washington Oil Summit, but the effects lingered throughout the 1970s. The dollar price of energy increased again the following year, amid the weakening competitive position of the dollar in world markets.

The Arab oil embargo ended the long period of prosperity in the West that had begun in 1945, throwing the world's economy into the steepest economic contraction since the Great Depression.

Impact on oil exporting nations

This price increase had a dramatic effect on oil exporting nations, for the countries of the Middle East who had long been dominated by the industrial powers were seen to have taken control of a vital commodity. The oil-exporting nations began to accumulate vast wealth.

Some of the income was dispensed in the form of aid to other underdeveloped nations whose economies had been caught between higher oil prices and lower prices for their own export commodities, amid shrinking Western demand. Much went for arms purchases that exacerbated political tensions, particularly in the Middle East. Saudi Arabia spent over 100 billion dollars in the ensuing decades for helping spread its fundamentalist interpretation of Islam, known as Wahhabism.

The oil embargo led a sudden interest in the Palestinian issue. On 8 November 1973, Kissinger became the first Secretary of State to meet with a Saudi leader since 1953 as he met King Faisal to ask him to end the embargo. Within two week of the embargo being launched, all of the foreign ministers of the nations of the European Economic Community met in a conference to issue a statement calling for Israel "to end the territorial occupation which has maintained since the conflict of 1967".

OPEC-member states raised the prospect of nationalization of oil company holdings. Most notably, Saudi Arabia nationalized Aramco in 1980 under the leadership of Saudi oil minister Ahmed Zaki Yamani.

Impact on the oil importing countries

The embargo had a negative influence on the US economy by causing immediate demands to address the threats to U.S. energy security. Macroeconomic problems consisted of both inflationary and deflationary impacts. The average US retail price of a gallon of regular gasoline rose 43% from 38.5¢ in May 1973 to 55.1¢ in June 1974. State governments asked citizens not to put up Christmas lights.

The Soviet Union was not a beneficiary of the oil crisis. The crisis prompted the USSR to raise energy prices within the Council on Mutual Economic Assistance (CMEA).

The embargo was not uniform across Western Europe. Of the nine members of the European Economic Community (EEC), the Netherlands faced a complete embargo. By contrast Britain and France received almost uninterrupted supplies. That was their reward for refusing to allow the US to use their airfields and stopping arms and supplies to both the Arabs and the Israelis.

Japan was hard hit since it imported 90% of its oil from the Middle East. It had a stockpile good for 55 days, and another 20-day supply was en route. Facing its most serious crisis since 1945 the government ordered a 10% cut in the consumption of industrial oil and electricity. Moscow tried to take advantage by promising energy assistance if Japan returned the Kurile Islands. Tokyo refused.

The oil shock destroyed the economy of South Vietnam. A spokesman for Nguyễn Văn Thiệu admitted in a TV interview that the government was being "overwhelmed" by the inflation caused by the oil shock. In December 1973, Vietcong sappers attacked and destroyed the petroleum depot of Nha Be, further depleting fuel sources.

Consequences

OPEC soon lost its preeminent position, and in 1981, its production was surpassed by that of other countries. Additionally, its own member nations were divided. Saudi Arabia, trying to recover market share, increased production, pushing prices down, shrinking or eliminating profits for high-cost producers. The world price, which had peaked during the 1979 energy crisis at nearly $40 per barrel, decreased during the 1980s to less than $10 per barrel.

The embargo encouraged new venues for energy exploration, including Alaska, the North Sea, the Caspian Sea, and the Caucasus. Exploration in the Caspian Basin and Siberia became profitable. Cooperation changed into a far more adversarial relationship as the USSR increased its production. By 1980, the Soviet Union had become the world's largest producer.

Heavily populated, impoverished countries, whose economies were largely dependent on oil—including Mexico, Nigeria, Algeria, and Libya—did not prepare for a market reversal that left them in sometimes desperate situations.

When reduced demand and increased production glutted the world market in the mid-1980s, oil prices plummeted and the cartel lost its unity. Mexico (a non-member), Nigeria, and Venezuela, whose economies had expanded in the 1970s, faced near-bankruptcy, and even Saudi Arabian economic power was significantly weakened. The divisions within OPEC made concerted action more difficult. As of 2015, OPEC has never approached its earlier dominance.

Megathreads and spaces to hang out:

reminders:

  • 💚 You nerds can join specific comms to see posts about all sorts of topics
  • 💙 Hexbear’s algorithm prioritizes comments over upbears
  • 💜 Sorting by new you nerd
  • 🌈 If you ever want to make your own megathread, you can reserve a spot here nerd
  • 🐶 Join the unofficial Hexbear-adjacent Mastodon instance toots.matapacos.dog

Links To Resources (Aid and Theory):

Aid:

Theory:

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 19 points 2 years ago

Its going to be hard talking to liberals about the USSR from now on, because I barely care about anything they did wrong compared to the wrongs of capitalism. Like Stalin has many critiques, but they are laughable when compared to someone like ronald reagan, churchill, or even george bush. The communists of China and the Soviets gave the largest improvements to living standards ever IN HISTORY. One built with their own hands and resources, not having to profit off imperialism and exploitation. Its really incomparable. The liberals have sought to make mountains out of mole-hills to disguise the fact that COMMUNISM WAS, IS, AND WILL BE GOOD IN EVERY WAY! They have nothing else. The heap of garbage they piled on communism is large, but the storm of history will blow it away.

Organize, my comrades, we have a world to win.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago

I basically feel the same way but instead of the libs in my life I'm just trying to deal with the libs in my org

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

libs can be cool but are roadblocks ideologically, its very frustrating

[-] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

i find talking about the USSR with libs to be kinda pointless tbh
you can present them with whatever actual facts you like and the majority of them won't care
easier to just talk about how their own lives will improve with socialism
defending the honour of a now-dead state to the detriment of recruitment is counter-productive

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

this is silly, lol, have you talked to libs? All they care about is the USSR! You need to dispel the lies about socialist economy and government, and that really does start with the USSR for many. You want them to stop buying into US bullshit? Getting them to realize the truth about the USSR is really the best way. You really think you're going to get anyone helpful that thinks mao killed 60000 gorilliona small children? Im fine if they disagree on some points, but just believing US lies makes you ideologically untrustworthy in my view. Good enough to work a soup line, yes, maybe, but im never going to let one of those time bombs near anything important! Hell yes Im going to state my beliefs directly and bluntly, soft words will not break brainwashing. Not getting each person to become a stalinist or some shit, but making sure they know that former socialism did work, and with some light reform can work again to much effectiveness. Any organization with that kind of political strength is neigh unstoppable, especially if they get on the ground organizing done regularly.

'Defending the honor' lol if only it was so simple. Perhaps just maybe a little, but I think the tens of millions who died for us deserve to not be spit upon. Don't you? Especially since they were completely right.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

this is silly, lol, have you talked to libs?

yes, agitation and recruitment is the main thing i do for my party

the rest

i'm not american, but it's easier to get people to the truth about former/current socialist states by getting them in the door first instead of dropping the "everything you've been taught is a lie" immediately

the last bit

personally i see getting people on-side more important than them having the correct view on our forebears, if you get them to come around then softening their incorrect views on AES is easier, they eventually come around

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

Which party?

huh thats kind of what I was arguing for, but im realizing I kind of came at that wayyyy too hard, sorry comrade. Although organizing in america is a completely different experience, or just an more unique one (not easier, not harder, just its weird thing you know) Stalin is literally the thing Im asked about in every conversation about even wages. Anythign communist? Stalin. Land back? mao. The area I do it is very much obsessed with these weirdos. We have lots of gusanos from south vietnam, s Korea, and China. It become the 1950s everytime you talk about anything more radical than a union.

Im not saying immediately, but just not tolerating terminal libshit anywhere above the lowest level should be enforced. Ideological mobilization is very important, as you know, I just think that this way helps more.

Its not correct views on the dead, its realistic views of actual socialism. We aren't reinventing anything, we are literally just pulling it out of the coffin for reuse, and slapping in computers to start where they left off.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

no worries, it's fine
i guess you know the conditions where you are better than i do
i apologise if i was annoying, i just have pretty strong views on how to recruit people lol

i prefer not to name my party online, i don't want to be seen as a representative of us when i'm somewhere that i like to cut loose

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

thank you! I have a tendency to bite someones head off for no reason.

i just have pretty strong views on how to recruit people lol

I can respect strong views and personal morals, you have a spine!

Tis fine, understandable.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

I have a tendency to bite someones head off for no reason.

same lol

stalin-heart

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

My boomer dad started referring to the Russians as the Soviets now, and all I can say is I FUCKING WISH

this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2023
114 points (100.0% liked)

History

23623 readers
1 users here now

Welcome to c/history! History is written by the posters.

c/history is a comm for discussion about history so feel free to talk and post about articles, books, videos, events or historical figures you find interesting

Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember...we're all comrades here.

Do not post reactionary or imperialist takes (criticism is fine, but don't pull nonsense from whatever chud author is out there).

When sharing historical facts, remember to provide credible souces or citations.

Historical Disinformation will be removed

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS