this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2023
478 points (89.4% liked)

Lemmy.World Announcements

29022 readers
5 users here now

This Community is intended for posts about the Lemmy.world server by the admins.

Follow us for server news 🐘

Outages 🔥

https://status.lemmy.world

For support with issues at Lemmy.world, go to the Lemmy.world Support community.

Support e-mail

Any support requests are best sent to [email protected] e-mail.

Report contact

Donations 💗

If you would like to make a donation to support the cost of running this platform, please do so at the following donation URLs.

If you can, please use / switch to Ko-Fi, it has the lowest fees for us

Ko-Fi (Donate)

Bunq (Donate)

Open Collective backers and sponsors

Patreon

Join the team

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Hello World!

We've made some changes today, and we'd like to announce that our Code of Conduct is no longer in effect. We now have a new Terms of Service, in effect starting from today(October 19, 2023).

The "LAST REVISION DATE:" on the page also signifies when the page was last edited, and it is updated automatically. Details of specific edits may be viewed by following the "Page History" reference at the bottom of the page. All significant edits will also be announced to our users.

The new Terms of Service can be found at https://legal.lemmy.world/


In this post our community mods and users may express their questions, concerns, requests and issues regarding the Terms of Service, and content moderation in Lemmy.World. We hope to discuss and inform constructively and in good faith.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 179 points 1 year ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (6 children)
[–] [email protected] 117 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

The best way to fuck a democratic process up is making votes public. No one should feel like there's a "deterrent" to voting. All that does is create incentive to reward/punish people for how they vote.

Voting is what fuels the content aggregation, too. It is a very bad idea to deter people from voting how they please because it strangles the algorithm of the data it needs to sort the content. You want people voting, a lot. That's what makes the whole thing work.

Edit: which is to say nothing of how bad it will get when people make tools that help automate retaliation for downvotes. You can potentially state an opinion in a comment and set up a bot to auto block every downvoter, then share that list publicly. You may think that sounds like a great system for weeding out hate but I promise you it's going to be far messier than that, and more importantly, this kind of retaliatory shit hurts the aggregation even more.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Votes on lemmy are inherently public, due to how federation works.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Votes are public on Lemmy, in the sense that if you have admin access to an instance that is federated you will be able to find who upvoted which posts/comments in the database.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That should really be changed so that you can only see the cumulative votes from any given instance and only a user's specific instance will have records of their individual upvotes and downvotes.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

That would make pushing posts to the top via botting way too easy, and far harder to detect. Federation is intentionally set up so that instances do not trust each other.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Since upvoting is most of what I do, I think it's great that people can see it was me who upvoted them.

I don't mind the accountability of a downvote at all. If I didn't craft a specific reply, it lets people know who to ask if they genuinely don't understand why their content was problematic.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

You can potentially state an opinion in a comment and set up a bot to auto block every downvoter, then share that list publicly.

Shhh dont give them ideas

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No one should feel like there’s a “deterrent” to voting.

. . . It is a very bad idea to deter people from voting

You misread. What I wrote:

deterrent against weaponizing downvotes

Voting and weaponizing downvotes are two very different things.

To be clear, I used the phrase "weaponizing downvotes" to paraphrase the intent behind the written policy I quoted in full. Here it is again:

Do not engage in content manipulation such as posting spam content, vote manipulation through using several user accounts or consistently down-voting a user. Vote for the content, not for the person.

Seems like you have a problem with the policy then, because it is requiring you to self-regulate your own voting, and to specifically NOT vote as you please, but in a way that is best for the community as a whole.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I’ve had a user disagree with me and then go through my entire post history and downvote every single one of my comments. I don’t get why someone would do that but I can see why Lemmy.world would put it against their terms of service.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

I get that all the time. It amused me greatly until the day I found out I can turn off the Fantasy Internet Points entirely. Now I have no idea if my votes are up or down or sideways.

And I don't care.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Why is it necessary to count votes cast an unlimited time after posting. The best policy is to register votes in the UI for the user but silently ignore votes after max duration. So they can feel like they stuck it to you while not having an unreasonable effect. You could even detect and silently discard downvotes that matched that pattern or rate limit the downvotes against one party silently.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

It happened to me, and it was the She-Ra fans who did it. They were angry that I called them monarchists.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

“Not my previous updoots😭”

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

proofs of idiocy and/or bad faith they offer

Then a downvote is justified, same user or not.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think that if you access Lemmy via api, you can see who downvoted you specifically. I’d prefer it’d be turned off as I think people feel better about participation when they don’t have to go on the record to other users officially.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just for clarity: it's not viewable through the API. As others have said, you need to spin up an instance. In contrast to the API, this means it's not free (due to server hosting and domain name costs), and it's not necessarily easy (for the non-techies).

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

If you were to turn that on for lemmy.world as well I think it would get you better voting behavior from users all around.

I don't think so. I think the more likely scenario is this would lead to people weaponizing other's downvote history, and then very quickly people would stop downvoting completely. You'd have less downvotes overall, which is not always a good thing. At that point they should just remove the ability to downvote altogether, they'll be accomplishing the same thing.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you were to turn that on for lemmy.world as well I think it would get you better voting behavior from users all around.

Is it possible on Lemmy interface ? I thought that data required to have a look at the database

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not through the Lemmy webUI, but if you spin up an instance and subscribe to communities, the posts and comments will start getting federated to your database.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

That's what I had in mind, thanks