Community Notes:

Vapes are safer than cigarettes, nobody in the history of ever has claimed they were safer than fresh air (city air, maybe). Independent studies done (mostly by the UK outside of the Phillip-Morrisphere) show it to be 95% safer than analog smoking, due to a lack of tar and other carcinogens produced by the burning of plant matter.

Vapes have more nicotine in them than cigarettes but "10 times" is a nonsense number pulled directly from your ass. What mg/ml are you referencing exactly? It's commonly sold between 3mg and 6mg for freebase and 20, 40, or 50 for salt nic, one of those is probably about correct for your math, which one?

Furthermore the reason for the increased nicotine content is the disparity in the absorption of nicotine between the ROIs, vaping it is less efficient than smoking it, and freebase absorbs differently than salt nic at that. You absorb less nicotine/hit vaping than smoking, so if you increase the nic content you can compensate for that. Of course you can overdo it too, and I also used to smoke a pack and a half a day, some only smoke like say half a pack.

The real "issue" is the ease, for instance I can vape at my desk at work but not smoke, so I vape more since I don't have to take a whole ass break for it, but in essence I've simply digitized the Mad Men era, they used to do what I do, but analog. Then again, if I couldn't do that, I'd have a log of zyns on me, it's not exactly like I'd be nicotine free.

BUT would it be safer for me to chainsmoke cigarettes all day, or vape a bunch? That is the question, not "would it be safer for me to vape or not?"

Inb4 "popcorn lung." You know cigarettes have 2,000x the amount of diacetyl (the responsible chem) as vapes? And nobody has EVER gotten popcorn lung from vaping NOR cigarettes? That's because it requires the powdered form to enter your lungs and settle like asbestos/mesothelioma, which has ONLY been observed in one popcorn factory that didn't use respirators.