you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 6 points 3 days ago* (3 children)

margins have become razor-thin on solar panels so maybe this is an attempt to reestablish a technological advantage? I don't like the sound of it, at least it is still under review.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 days ago* (2 children)

    China does have some kind of campaign to increase margins on Chinese products I think. Looks like it's termed "anti-involution": https://news.cgtn.com/news/2025-07-30/China-s-de-involution-Economic-logic-challenges-and-implications-1FqvXjxhJN6/p.html (CGTN website is kinda broken). Although it seems to be more about domestic competition.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

    thanks, good article

    While involution stems from domestic dynamics, China's de-involution push also carries important international signal value. For years, the country has been seen – especially in developed economies – as an exporter of ultra-low-cost goods, with its manufacturing advantage often attributed to cost containment.

    In this context, the de-involution agenda can be understood as a subtle yet strategic response to global concerns. Domestically, it echoes China's pursuit of "high-quality development." Internationally, it helps recast China's industrial image – not as a provider of affordable goods, but as a generator of trustworthy and durable products.

    This shift signals China's effort to align domestic reforms with international expectations, sending a clear message that it aims not to dominate markets through cost alone but to compete in a responsible and sustainable manner.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

    well yeah, i assume those companies are somehow indebted to local governments and compete on price ignoring their debt, so that might look not very good for the books of the provinces. but also it's like whatever, those who needed solar bought solar, naturally it would fall, the rest will need state-side subsidies via installments in other countries, export subventions or rollback of capacity.

  • source
  • parent