you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 23 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

That's probably for three reasons:

  • some "interesting" UI decision in GIMP
  • force of habits
  • GIMP is not a replacement for photoshop

Photoshop merges two very different things, editing and drawing. If you do only editing, GIMP is great. If you also do drawing/painting, GIMP is completely subpar, but Krita is fantastic.

There's also other tools of course. But GIMP, by itself, is not close to be a remplacement for all of photoshop.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    "Use gimp to replace photoshop!" - Linux users

    "GIMP is not a replacement for photoshop" - Also linux users

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments