106
Canada's first 'national interest' project is an oil pipeline, which means bye bye orcas and hello climate dystopia. And for what? (rachelgilmore.substack.com)
submitted 3 weeks ago by to c/canada@lemmy.ca
21 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 12 points 2 weeks ago* (12 children)

Why is it national interest to ship OUT your oil? I'd think keeping it IN the nation would actually be national interest. Oh? That's right, shareholder wealth...the rest is "f- the environment," actually.

And as we've seen with Iran and Venezuela, oil production paints a bullseye on you.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
    •
  • [–] 12 points 2 weeks ago (10 children)

    Because trade is good for everyone involved? That's something the Americans have completely lost the plot on.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
    •
  • [–] 11 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

    Trade with the US was bad for Canada every year prior.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 9 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

    It wouldn't have been if it was reliable.

    Fundamentally, trade happens when you've got something that you don't want as much as your neighbour does, but he has something that you want more than he does. The result is that each side gets something they wanted more.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 8 points 2 weeks ago* (4 children)

    Fundamentally it was just stealing from us to make them rich. Being unreliable is good for us.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

    It made both of us richer. Spare us this Trumpian zero-sum view, it's normal for both trading partners to benefit.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 7 points 2 weeks ago* (2 children)

    We benefited trading with the UK. The US didn't take over to benefit us. Don't act like the Canada/US (or NAFTA) wasn't the worst agreement in Canadian history.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    Depending on other nations to refine our oil leaves us vulnerable. Which is why if we nationalize and refine most of our own oil, it would allow us to keep profits within the Canadian economy. So trade isn’t always a positive.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 2 weeks ago

    We can build a pipeline a lot faster than we can build refineries. By all means do both, but the refineries won't be online for many years after we're already selling the unrefined stuff.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent