The former does not imply the latter.

it does. it doesnt conclusively prove it, but it is evidence toward it.

Just because we literally evolved to do something and have been doing it for millions of years doesn't mean there are no drawbacks

Missed the part where I said no drawbacks.

or that it doing it won't kill us.

Missed this too, apparently.

Are you making the argument that, in the future, eating meat will be determined to be unhealthy even though, as you put it, “we literally evolved to do” it?

Or perhaps there’s nothing wrong with eating meat, in and of itself, but consumption at the current scale is unhealthy? In no small part due to the potential for advanced viruses and illnesses created by jamming a bunch of animals together in confined spaces .

No, it’s not. Feel free to look up the definition of inherently and argue with the English language though.

So eating meat hasn’t been unhealthy for 2 million+ years but it will become unhealthy all of a sudden?

Or maybe your trying to shoehorn your personal beliefs to fit the question.