you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 31 points 4 weeks ago* (10 children)

It's also that so much work is pointless and doesn't serve a proper purpose for humanity. Things like ads, a lot of office jobs where people sit in endless meetings, and so on.

I think humanity has realized it's wasting our lives but we can't think of another system that will work.

Maybe universal income but the downside of that is that it comes with AI and transhumanism, which will remove what is human about humans.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    I hate how a big chunk of my work has become to write reports nobody should read. Our team produces a report every January, that gets passed to our director, that gets compiled into a yearly lab wide report, that gets combined into a 5-year report, that get sent to the government to ensure continuous funding… so much time wasted by everyone

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

    I'm 51 now and I learned from 25 years of working that wasting time is not a problem for large corporations or governments. Even in smaller companies, they value people being forced into office much higher than employees producing work.

    So the conclusion for me is that its just a system to keep everyone busy and conform to rules set by the corporation.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 4 weeks ago (5 children)

    Why would universal income come with AI and transhumanism?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    If the corporate fantasy of replacing all jobs with AI were to actually come to pass, what are all the now jobless people supposed to do? Quietly wait in a back alley to starve to death?

    So either universal income happens, or the one percent learn that there's no level of technology that will overcome a two orders of magnitude disadvantage in numbers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    Because the alternatives are pointless toil or perishing (spoilers: neither of these are off the table)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    You're going to have to elaborate on that. Why are those the alternatives?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago

    It's assuming a lot, but running with the premise of bots totally replacing human workers (dubious), either workers keep working even though they don't need to (pointles toil), or they cease to exist as they last lever on power is removed (the ability to bargain by withholding their labour).

    It's silly

  • source
  • parent