I guess if the Government/Ice wants you they can imprison you and your friends

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 16 points 15 hours ago (11 children)

Name how or what would be different compared to a ride share with a human, or a taxi?

Robotaxis are NOT unattended — a human has a video feed into the cab of the car. It was a human that called the police.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 14 hours ago (10 children)

    Name how or what would be different compared to a ride share with a human, or a taxi?

    My criticisms extend to those, too, if they have the same policy. But they very well may not, since taxis are actually regulated (as opposed to these new services that are somehow magically different for "reasons").

    Meanwhile, legitimate public transit allows legal carrying. Example: "MARTA follows the State’s laws on carrying weapons."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 13 hours ago (9 children)

    So you're saying that your right to carry a firearm overrides the rights of a property owner to decide whether you're allowed on their private property? If someone was to get into your car while carrying something that was legal for them to carry but that you didn't want in your car, you shouldn't be allowed to eject them?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 13 hours ago (3 children)

    I'm saying that a corporation providing a transportation service to the public is an entirely different fucking situation than an actual human in their home. Corporations providing services can and should be regulated to ensure fairness. Look up the phrase "common carrier."

    What's next? You want robotaxis to be allowed to refuse to carry colored people? 'Cause that's the equivalent of the argument you're trying to make!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 12 hours ago

    I'm saying that a corporation providing a transportation service to the public is an entirely different fucking situation than an actual human in their home.

    Your car is your home? Sorry, didn't realize you were so hard up.

    You want robotaxis to be allowed to refuse to carry colored people?

    Did you know there's a law specifically prohibiting discrimination on that basis? There isn't a similar law for guns. It is not an "equivalent argument" and trying to compare carrying a gun to having a particular skin colour is frankly bonkers.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 7 hours ago

    Cause that's the equivalent of the argument you're trying to make!

    Says the person that base their entire argument on cc/oc being equal to waving around a fucking ar inside of a cab

    Lmao clown

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -2 points 13 hours ago (4 children)

    A human can stop you from entering the car in the first place. You can tell the human “hey I’m going to the shooting range.” and they can go “nah sorry.” There’s nobody in the robot taxi so it can’t. What are you gonna do? Talk to the car and tell it about your plans at the range? There’s no other humans in the car to be at risk or even just afraid.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

    Waymo taxis can indeed talk to the people inside them. They can also connect you to a remote human operator if you want to "talk to a supervisor."

    If your rule is "no guns in my car" why do you think saying "but I'm just going to the shooting range" makes a difference?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

    And those people are only going to do something AFTER you enter the car. A human can stop you from even entering the car in the first place/kick you out immediately.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 12 hours ago (1 child)

    I'm really not clear what point you're trying to make. If I manage to conceal a gun until I'm inside your car you can't kick me out? Or there's some sort of time limit on being able to kick me out?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • Why would anyone un conceal the gun just because I’m in your car? The gun was likely the same level of concelead, it just took the cameras longer to detect what it was. A human can go “hey what’s that?” And when you tell them it’s a gun they can say no thanks. Are the humans monitoring the robo taxis really going to be that much of a person about it? They’re going to wait until they’re certain it’s a gun before doing something about it.

    Also in some states you legally can ignore no firearms signs. A. If they’re not the right size/format or B. Concealed carry permits can just override them in some places. Not sure how it applies to a taxi. But in theory I can just ignore a no firearms sign on a restaurant. But that’s a concealed carry. Ain’t nobody concealing a full size rifle. Especially when getting into a car.

  • source
  • parent