I think they were trying to make an equivalent argument to the questions around the existence of plant-based "meats". That line of reasoning usually goes "why create a meat-like 'concoction' from plants rather than just eating delicious plant products themselves? Why do we need products resembling meat? Just eat a plant-based diet."

I understand now that these products aren't for me, and aren't necessarily for those who are comfortable working directly with plants in the kitchen. They also provide an easy off-ramp from a more meat-heavy diet. Beyond Burgers are akin to vapes for those struggling to eat less meat. They have their place.

Sure we can judge things by the sum of their parts. Like how no matter how well prepared any meal is, no matter how divine it's mouthfeel, I am unable to take pleasure in the consumption of a food that I know is the result of immense animal suffering. That is what animal products are made of too. They are also made of human suffering from the workers who are all but forced into working in slaughterhouses, an occupation well known for causing ptsd in its workers. I also derive no pleasure in knowing that animal overconsumption is one of the primary drivers of heart disease - the number one killer in most western countries, something which is completely preventable in 99% of people.

Animal products are also made of wanton environmental destruction, as well as being a massive zoonotic disease vector.

So why stop there? Please take your analysis even further.