▲ 885 ▼ Brilliant‼️ (thelemmy.club) submitted 4 days ago by Buage_@piefed.social to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world 179 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 117 points 4 days ago (9 children) why tf is the word drunk censored. permalink fedilink source hideshow 18 child comments replies: [–] SanderZeldenthuis@nord.pub 43 points 4 days ago that's it now they know you are dr*nk permalink fedilink source parent [–] Klear@piefed.world 42 points 4 days ago (2 children) Engagement bait. Just downvote and move on next time. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago (2 children) Pretty sure lemmy doesnt track any engagement except votes. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] zikzak025@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago* That's assuming this image was originally made to be shared on Lemmy. But most content in this community almost certainly comes from somewhere else first. We inherit secondhand social media engagement metrics. permalink fedilink source parent [–] bus_factor@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago (1 child) Pretty sure you can sort by activity. Also, most stuff on here was on a different platform first. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] markz@suppo.fi 4 points 4 days ago Sort by active is calculated from votes and age of last reply, but the number of comments itself is pretty useless. permalink fedilink source parent [–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 2 points 4 days ago (1 child) People copy stuff from elsewhere. This is the internet. Blaming OP is just st*pid permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Klear@piefed.world 6 points 4 days ago Nah, fuck anyone normalising this shit. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 31 points 4 days ago (1 child) OP can edit and claim this as their own work: permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] rustydrd@sh.itjust.works 16 points 4 days ago (1 child) EXCUSE ME???? CHILDREN MIGHT SEE THIS??? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Janx@piefed.social 1 point 2 days ago Better pour em a shot first. permalink fedilink source parent [–] socsa@piefed.social 11 points 4 days ago (1 child) Useless censorship has become a shibboleth for social media brain rot. People do it to mark themselves as current on social media trends. That's all it is. There's no evidence that it has anything to do with content strikes. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] funkajunk@lemmy.world 1 point 4 days ago Your use of the word shibboleth is a shibboleth permalink fedilink source parent [–] elevenbones@sh.itjust.works 9 points 4 days ago Thanks you 🙏, I had no idea what that word was permalink fedilink source parent [–] PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S@anarchist.nexus 9 points 4 days ago Mind your fucking language! /j permalink fedilink source parent [–] OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works 1 point 4 days ago They didn't even cover the entire letter. It just looks like there's stuff stuck to the fourth wall. permalink fedilink source parent [–] chunk6235@piefed.social 1 point 4 days ago Engagement bait permalink fedilink source parent [–] wuffah@lemmy.world 1 point 4 days ago (1 child) Information is monetized by censorship. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 child) on lemmy? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wuffah@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (3 children) No, in general. I just think it’s funny that the internet was invented to transfer information and the first thing we did with it was figure out how to censor it - copyrighted media, news, p*rnography, the word pornography, etc. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 days ago* C*nsorshp really has gotten outta hand. permalink fedilink source parent [–] terranoid@lemmy.cafe 1 point 4 days ago* (1 child) It's not to censor the idea. It's that dupe detection bots use ocr text detection and fucking with letters can defeat it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wuffah@lemmy.world 1 point 4 days ago And the bots would then take down the image with the offending text? permalink fedilink source parent [–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 1 point 4 days ago (1 child) yeah. thats not lemmy though right? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wuffah@lemmy.world 1 point 4 days ago (1 child) Well, I mean it’s right there in the image. Although, I guess Lemmy doesn’t have anything directly to do with censoring it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago (1 child) I asked why OP censored the image. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wuffah@lemmy.world 1 point 4 days ago (1 child) Is it to fool censorship bots that use OCR to recognize banned words? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 1 point 4 days ago (1 child) does lemmy use OCR or have banned words? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wuffah@lemmy.world 1 point 4 days ago Probably not. I’m assuming that the censored image is from another platform that does, or is pre-censored for general reposting. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SanderZeldenthuis@nord.pub 43 points 4 days ago that's it now they know you are dr*nk permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Klear@piefed.world 42 points 4 days ago (2 children) Engagement bait. Just downvote and move on next time. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago (2 children) Pretty sure lemmy doesnt track any engagement except votes. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] zikzak025@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago* That's assuming this image was originally made to be shared on Lemmy. But most content in this community almost certainly comes from somewhere else first. We inherit secondhand social media engagement metrics. permalink fedilink source parent [–] bus_factor@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago (1 child) Pretty sure you can sort by activity. Also, most stuff on here was on a different platform first. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] markz@suppo.fi 4 points 4 days ago Sort by active is calculated from votes and age of last reply, but the number of comments itself is pretty useless. permalink fedilink source parent [–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 2 points 4 days ago (1 child) People copy stuff from elsewhere. This is the internet. Blaming OP is just st*pid permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Klear@piefed.world 6 points 4 days ago Nah, fuck anyone normalising this shit. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago (2 children) Pretty sure lemmy doesnt track any engagement except votes. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] zikzak025@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago* That's assuming this image was originally made to be shared on Lemmy. But most content in this community almost certainly comes from somewhere else first. We inherit secondhand social media engagement metrics. permalink fedilink source parent [–] bus_factor@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago (1 child) Pretty sure you can sort by activity. Also, most stuff on here was on a different platform first. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] markz@suppo.fi 4 points 4 days ago Sort by active is calculated from votes and age of last reply, but the number of comments itself is pretty useless. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] zikzak025@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago* That's assuming this image was originally made to be shared on Lemmy. But most content in this community almost certainly comes from somewhere else first. We inherit secondhand social media engagement metrics. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bus_factor@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago (1 child) Pretty sure you can sort by activity. Also, most stuff on here was on a different platform first. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] markz@suppo.fi 4 points 4 days ago Sort by active is calculated from votes and age of last reply, but the number of comments itself is pretty useless. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] markz@suppo.fi 4 points 4 days ago Sort by active is calculated from votes and age of last reply, but the number of comments itself is pretty useless. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 2 points 4 days ago (1 child) People copy stuff from elsewhere. This is the internet. Blaming OP is just st*pid permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Klear@piefed.world 6 points 4 days ago Nah, fuck anyone normalising this shit. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Klear@piefed.world 6 points 4 days ago Nah, fuck anyone normalising this shit. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 31 points 4 days ago (1 child) OP can edit and claim this as their own work: permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] rustydrd@sh.itjust.works 16 points 4 days ago (1 child) EXCUSE ME???? CHILDREN MIGHT SEE THIS??? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Janx@piefed.social 1 point 2 days ago Better pour em a shot first. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] rustydrd@sh.itjust.works 16 points 4 days ago (1 child) EXCUSE ME???? CHILDREN MIGHT SEE THIS??? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Janx@piefed.social 1 point 2 days ago Better pour em a shot first. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Janx@piefed.social 1 point 2 days ago Better pour em a shot first. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] socsa@piefed.social 11 points 4 days ago (1 child) Useless censorship has become a shibboleth for social media brain rot. People do it to mark themselves as current on social media trends. That's all it is. There's no evidence that it has anything to do with content strikes. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] funkajunk@lemmy.world 1 point 4 days ago Your use of the word shibboleth is a shibboleth permalink fedilink source parent
[–] funkajunk@lemmy.world 1 point 4 days ago Your use of the word shibboleth is a shibboleth permalink fedilink source parent
[–] elevenbones@sh.itjust.works 9 points 4 days ago Thanks you 🙏, I had no idea what that word was permalink fedilink source parent
[–] PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S@anarchist.nexus 9 points 4 days ago Mind your fucking language! /j permalink fedilink source parent
[–] OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works 1 point 4 days ago They didn't even cover the entire letter. It just looks like there's stuff stuck to the fourth wall. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] wuffah@lemmy.world 1 point 4 days ago (1 child) Information is monetized by censorship. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 child) on lemmy? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wuffah@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (3 children) No, in general. I just think it’s funny that the internet was invented to transfer information and the first thing we did with it was figure out how to censor it - copyrighted media, news, p*rnography, the word pornography, etc. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 days ago* C*nsorshp really has gotten outta hand. permalink fedilink source parent [–] terranoid@lemmy.cafe 1 point 4 days ago* (1 child) It's not to censor the idea. It's that dupe detection bots use ocr text detection and fucking with letters can defeat it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wuffah@lemmy.world 1 point 4 days ago And the bots would then take down the image with the offending text? permalink fedilink source parent [–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 1 point 4 days ago (1 child) yeah. thats not lemmy though right? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wuffah@lemmy.world 1 point 4 days ago (1 child) Well, I mean it’s right there in the image. Although, I guess Lemmy doesn’t have anything directly to do with censoring it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago (1 child) I asked why OP censored the image. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wuffah@lemmy.world 1 point 4 days ago (1 child) Is it to fool censorship bots that use OCR to recognize banned words? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 1 point 4 days ago (1 child) does lemmy use OCR or have banned words? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wuffah@lemmy.world 1 point 4 days ago Probably not. I’m assuming that the censored image is from another platform that does, or is pre-censored for general reposting. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 child) on lemmy? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wuffah@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (3 children) No, in general. I just think it’s funny that the internet was invented to transfer information and the first thing we did with it was figure out how to censor it - copyrighted media, news, p*rnography, the word pornography, etc. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 days ago* C*nsorshp really has gotten outta hand. permalink fedilink source parent [–] terranoid@lemmy.cafe 1 point 4 days ago* (1 child) It's not to censor the idea. It's that dupe detection bots use ocr text detection and fucking with letters can defeat it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wuffah@lemmy.world 1 point 4 days ago And the bots would then take down the image with the offending text? permalink fedilink source parent [–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 1 point 4 days ago (1 child) yeah. thats not lemmy though right? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wuffah@lemmy.world 1 point 4 days ago (1 child) Well, I mean it’s right there in the image. Although, I guess Lemmy doesn’t have anything directly to do with censoring it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago (1 child) I asked why OP censored the image. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wuffah@lemmy.world 1 point 4 days ago (1 child) Is it to fool censorship bots that use OCR to recognize banned words? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 1 point 4 days ago (1 child) does lemmy use OCR or have banned words? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wuffah@lemmy.world 1 point 4 days ago Probably not. I’m assuming that the censored image is from another platform that does, or is pre-censored for general reposting. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] wuffah@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (3 children) No, in general. I just think it’s funny that the internet was invented to transfer information and the first thing we did with it was figure out how to censor it - copyrighted media, news, p*rnography, the word pornography, etc. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 days ago* C*nsorshp really has gotten outta hand. permalink fedilink source parent [–] terranoid@lemmy.cafe 1 point 4 days ago* (1 child) It's not to censor the idea. It's that dupe detection bots use ocr text detection and fucking with letters can defeat it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wuffah@lemmy.world 1 point 4 days ago And the bots would then take down the image with the offending text? permalink fedilink source parent [–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 1 point 4 days ago (1 child) yeah. thats not lemmy though right? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wuffah@lemmy.world 1 point 4 days ago (1 child) Well, I mean it’s right there in the image. Although, I guess Lemmy doesn’t have anything directly to do with censoring it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago (1 child) I asked why OP censored the image. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wuffah@lemmy.world 1 point 4 days ago (1 child) Is it to fool censorship bots that use OCR to recognize banned words? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 1 point 4 days ago (1 child) does lemmy use OCR or have banned words? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wuffah@lemmy.world 1 point 4 days ago Probably not. I’m assuming that the censored image is from another platform that does, or is pre-censored for general reposting. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 days ago* C*nsorshp really has gotten outta hand. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] terranoid@lemmy.cafe 1 point 4 days ago* (1 child) It's not to censor the idea. It's that dupe detection bots use ocr text detection and fucking with letters can defeat it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wuffah@lemmy.world 1 point 4 days ago And the bots would then take down the image with the offending text? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] wuffah@lemmy.world 1 point 4 days ago And the bots would then take down the image with the offending text? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 1 point 4 days ago (1 child) yeah. thats not lemmy though right? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wuffah@lemmy.world 1 point 4 days ago (1 child) Well, I mean it’s right there in the image. Although, I guess Lemmy doesn’t have anything directly to do with censoring it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago (1 child) I asked why OP censored the image. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wuffah@lemmy.world 1 point 4 days ago (1 child) Is it to fool censorship bots that use OCR to recognize banned words? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 1 point 4 days ago (1 child) does lemmy use OCR or have banned words? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wuffah@lemmy.world 1 point 4 days ago Probably not. I’m assuming that the censored image is from another platform that does, or is pre-censored for general reposting. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] wuffah@lemmy.world 1 point 4 days ago (1 child) Well, I mean it’s right there in the image. Although, I guess Lemmy doesn’t have anything directly to do with censoring it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago (1 child) I asked why OP censored the image. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wuffah@lemmy.world 1 point 4 days ago (1 child) Is it to fool censorship bots that use OCR to recognize banned words? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 1 point 4 days ago (1 child) does lemmy use OCR or have banned words? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wuffah@lemmy.world 1 point 4 days ago Probably not. I’m assuming that the censored image is from another platform that does, or is pre-censored for general reposting. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago (1 child) I asked why OP censored the image. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wuffah@lemmy.world 1 point 4 days ago (1 child) Is it to fool censorship bots that use OCR to recognize banned words? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 1 point 4 days ago (1 child) does lemmy use OCR or have banned words? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wuffah@lemmy.world 1 point 4 days ago Probably not. I’m assuming that the censored image is from another platform that does, or is pre-censored for general reposting. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] wuffah@lemmy.world 1 point 4 days ago (1 child) Is it to fool censorship bots that use OCR to recognize banned words? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 1 point 4 days ago (1 child) does lemmy use OCR or have banned words? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wuffah@lemmy.world 1 point 4 days ago Probably not. I’m assuming that the censored image is from another platform that does, or is pre-censored for general reposting. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 1 point 4 days ago (1 child) does lemmy use OCR or have banned words? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wuffah@lemmy.world 1 point 4 days ago Probably not. I’m assuming that the censored image is from another platform that does, or is pre-censored for general reposting. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] wuffah@lemmy.world 1 point 4 days ago Probably not. I’m assuming that the censored image is from another platform that does, or is pre-censored for general reposting. permalink fedilink source parent