55
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2026
55 points (100.0% liked)
History
24104 readers
136 users here now
Welcome to c/history! History is written by the posters.
c/history is a comm for discussion about history so feel free to talk and post about articles, books, videos, events or historical figures you find interesting
Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember...we're all comrades here.
Do not post reactionary or imperialist takes (criticism is fine, but don't pull nonsense from whatever chud author is out there).
When sharing historical facts, remember to provide credible souces or citations.
Historical Disinformation will be removed

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
Very interesting! Made me realize something that I had never thought about before - basically every single biology class will teach that the order of operations was the opposite, that women evolved wider hips for giving birth, a framing which seems like common sense only because we are taught to see men as the "default" in most contexts.
Which is bass ackwards, right? IIRC my anthropology other animals and even other great apes have nowhere as difficult childbirth as humans. Wide birthing hips is the norm in the animal kingdom, being bipedal I think favors narrower pelvic structure, and of course baby humans have big ol' noggins for their big ol' brains. Even delivering them while their skulls are still soft is still a harrowing balancing act.
But it had not occurred to me to think of it in this light, that narrower male hips evolve because being even more better at walking is an advantage with no cost because males aren't the ones delivering babies.