you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -30 points 3 weeks ago (14 children)

It seems the only reason people aren't buying it is because its not good enough. AI generated 3d models will soon have their opus4.8(idk which model was the breakthrough at the start of this year) moment and then that will flip as it has for other AI generation.

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 3 weeks ago (10 children)

    Why would anyone buy an AI-generated 3D model if you could just buy a Claude license and have the AI make it for you from scratch?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    Why would anyone buy an AI-generated 3D model if you could buy one created by a real human with real skills?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    Because your standards are low, you don't actually give a fuck, you need a cheap placeholder, it's for a random throw away thing.

    There is literally countless reasons a cheap mass produced slop model is preferable to a high quality human made one.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (5 children)

    Never underestimate the power of convenience. (aka laziness)

    But, maybe the market for these AI generated 3D models will tank as the AI models improve. We're in a period where there is a lot of churn-- no one knows what the economic landscape for any given AI impacted market will look like in the near future.

    It could be that the cost of flooding this market with AI generated 3D models is low enough that it still makes profit, a la spam mail. Or it could be that AI models improve such that it's trivial for people to prompt for their own 3D models and the need for this marketplace vanishes entirely. Or somewhere in the middle.

    No one knows, and anyone who says with certainty that they do is selling you something.

    Edit: two different types of models being discussed. Clarified.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

    As the article says, people are already not buying AI generated 3d models. So the price can't really tank further.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago (3 children)

    The article has this to say:

    the marketplace is being flooded by AI-generated assets, representing one in six models — but they only account for only $1 out of every $90 in revenue.

    That's not $0.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago (2 children)
  • [–] 2 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    I keep hearing this claim and I keep not seeing results.

    Not that current models aren’t better than the ones a year ago. They are just only slightly better, and have made no progress on the most glaring issues.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    What do you consider the glaring issues to be?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 3 weeks ago

    That they make up incorrect responses rather than admit they don’t have the correct answer.

    That’s for LLMs though. I don’t know much about 3D model generating models. I imagine they are more similar to image generation models, and have similar issues to those.

  • source
  • parent