368
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] joe@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Never underestimate the power of convenience. (aka laziness)

But, maybe the market for these AI generated 3D models will tank as the AI models improve. We're in a period where there is a lot of churn-- no one knows what the economic landscape for any given AI impacted market will look like in the near future.

It could be that the cost of flooding this market with AI generated 3D models is low enough that it still makes profit, a la spam mail. Or it could be that AI models improve such that it's trivial for people to prompt for their own 3D models and the need for this marketplace vanishes entirely. Or somewhere in the middle.

No one knows, and anyone who says with certainty that they do is selling you something.

Edit: two different types of models being discussed. Clarified.

[-] chaogomu@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

As the article says, people are already not buying AI generated 3d models. So the price can't really tank further.

[-] joe@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

The article has this to say:

the marketplace is being flooded by AI-generated assets, representing one in six models — but they only account for only $1 out of every $90 in revenue.

That's not $0.

[-] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago
[-] joe@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago

Is it? Maybe I'm missing some context you have, but if they are hypothetically selling $90,000/day (a made up, probably too large number) then AI generated 3D models bring in $1,000/day.

That's not $0/day.

[-] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago

When you consider operating costs, yes, probably less than zero.

this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2026
368 points (97.2% liked)

News

38864 readers
1772 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS