353
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] JensSpahnpasta@feddit.org 7 points 6 hours ago

Years? Many models are gone in a few months. If you build 100 automations based on them, you need to upgrade and retest them constantly.

And most business processes are totally fine with a "If this, then that" logic. Companies work like that. The law kind of works like that. No need for expensive and problematic chatbots. Just automate based on simple if loops.

[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

If people were looking at this intelligently, they'd clearly see that AI is heavily subsidized and you can use the subsidized help to fix your broken shit without becoming completely dependent upon it being subsidized forever.

But stupid is as stupid does, so they'll all just continue to add unhelpful chatbots to their software and token consuming nonsense workflows instead of fixing any quantity of their huge amount of open problems.

[-] JensSpahnpasta@feddit.org 1 points 3 hours ago

Yeah - those people investing trillions in AI companies and datacenters want to earn their trillions back with interest.

this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2026
353 points (96.8% liked)

Work Reform

17190 readers
3185 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS